Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If they had options for every 'new' sexuality term on here, the list would be a mile long. Surely 'hetero flexible' is bi, and that's already included. " How is "hetero-flexible" much different in practice to "bi-curious"? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please can we have the orientation Hetero flexible added as an option?" Yes please! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi curious tick box already exists. Hetero flexible is a rubbish term made up for homophobic straight people. " I'm certainly not homophobic! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Heres a thought...put it in your bio... we dont need the bloody term. If your are happy to play with guys as well as women you are bi simple as that. Everyone looking for ways to be offended it p*sses me.off! " Not sure anyone is offended. I think many just find the bi-curious and bi-sexual limiting for male and female. Large number of people have dabbled and occasionally might again in the right circumstances so are beyond curious but a long way from being bi which implies more. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Heres a thought...put it in your bio... we dont need the bloody term. If your are happy to play with guys as well as women you are bi simple as that. Everyone looking for ways to be offended it p*sses me.off! " PS seems lots looking for ways to get easily pissed off Chill. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi curious tick box already exists. Hetero flexible is a rubbish term made up for homophobic straight people. " We are together nearly twenty years and married for a little under half of that time. We have never had any attraction to the same sex. Regardless of us being married, neither of us would have any interest in individually pursuing anybody of the same sex. We believe this would place us in the space of being straight. We are not bi sexual. We have no curiosity to become bi sexual or experience what it might be like to be bisexual. We are 100% not homophobic. Since joining Fab and starting our swinging journey we quickly realised that being open to playing with the same sex, especially in a two couples scenario can only (in our opinion at least) enhance the overall experience. It increases the options on what can happen and everybody can play with everybody with no restrictions. If you take a look at our profile we have explained this in an effort to be as transparent as possible to the people who may be interested in meeting us. We are straight and attracted to the opposite sex. Maybe that will change as we continue our journey and we have no problem with that but for now we are both straight and open or “flexible” to playing with it and engaging in some sexual activity with the same sex. We feel hetreo flexible describes us perfectly. For reference, hetero flexible is described as a form of sexual orientation or situational sexual behaviour characterised by minimal homosexual activity in an otherwise primarily heterosexual orientation. It has been characterized as "mostly straight". While everybody is of course entitled to their own opinion, we don’t believe hetero flexible is a made up term for homophobic straight people. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi curious tick box already exists. Hetero flexible is a rubbish term made up for homophobic straight people. We are together nearly twenty years and married for a little under half of that time. We have never had any attraction to the same sex. Regardless of us being married, neither of us would have any interest in individually pursuing anybody of the same sex. We believe this would place us in the space of being straight. We are not bi sexual. We have no curiosity to become bi sexual or experience what it might be like to be bisexual. We are 100% not homophobic. Since joining Fab and starting our swinging journey we quickly realised that being open to playing with the same sex, especially in a two couples scenario can only (in our opinion at least) enhance the overall experience. It increases the options on what can happen and everybody can play with everybody with no restrictions. If you take a look at our profile we have explained this in an effort to be as transparent as possible to the people who may be interested in meeting us. We are straight and attracted to the opposite sex. Maybe that will change as we continue our journey and we have no problem with that but for now we are both straight and open or “flexible” to playing with it and engaging in some sexual activity with the same sex. We feel hetreo flexible describes us perfectly. For reference, hetero flexible is described as a form of sexual orientation or situational sexual behaviour characterised by minimal homosexual activity in an otherwise primarily heterosexual orientation. It has been characterized as "mostly straight". While everybody is of course entitled to their own opinion, we don’t believe hetero flexible is a made up term for homophobic straight people. " Well said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi curious tick box already exists. Hetero flexible is a rubbish term made up for homophobic straight people. I'm certainly not homophobic!" Outsider didn't say it was. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi curious tick box already exists. Hetero flexible is a rubbish term made up for homophobic straight people. We are together nearly twenty years and married for a little under half of that time. We have never had any attraction to the same sex. Regardless of us being married, neither of us would have any interest in individually pursuing anybody of the same sex. We believe this would place us in the space of being straight. We are not bi sexual. We have no curiosity to become bi sexual or experience what it might be like to be bisexual. We are 100% not homophobic. Since joining Fab and starting our swinging journey we quickly realised that being open to playing with the same sex, especially in a two couples scenario can only (in our opinion at least) enhance the overall experience. It increases the options on what can happen and everybody can play with everybody with no restrictions. If you take a look at our profile we have explained this in an effort to be as transparent as possible to the people who may be interested in meeting us. We are straight and attracted to the opposite sex. Maybe that will change as we continue our journey and we have no problem with that but for now we are both straight and open or “flexible” to playing with it and engaging in some sexual activity with the same sex. We feel hetreo flexible describes us perfectly. For reference, hetero flexible is described as a form of sexual orientation or situational sexual behaviour characterised by minimal homosexual activity in an otherwise primarily heterosexual orientation. It has been characterized as "mostly straight". While everybody is of course entitled to their own opinion, we don’t believe hetero flexible is a made up term for homophobic straight people. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bi curious tick box already exists. Hetero flexible is a rubbish term made up for homophobic straight people. I'm certainly not homophobic! Outsider didn't say it was." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Use bi curious and expand on it using your bio!" Exactly this we all have our nuances on what turns us on or doesn’t and frankly it’s can change depending on night, company’s d circumstances. The available descriptions will never cover everyone’s needs. Luckily we have lots of space to be more specific (should we want to be)in our bios.very well said | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The available descriptions will never cover everyone’s needs." Yes but this is exactly what this thread is about - making the suggestion to expand the available descriptions to help towards covering everyone’s needs in a broader way than the current options offer. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also to add to that, based on our experience there are a high number of people who clearly don’t read bios so yes, you can expand on the information in your bio which we have done, but not everybody reads it unfortunately " Not everyone even looks at sexuality either by the amount of straight men who get propositioned and the contents of my own inbox! Sexuality isn’t meant to cover everything as otherwise we’d have asexual, gender fluid etc etc it’s broad strokes only and the bio should be used to expand! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |