Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What say you?" I hate spending so much time scrolling through one after another MALE on CAM now listings then finally came across a MALE/FEMAKE icon just to click on it and some guys there by him self jacking off, then curiosity click on the profile and find that low life fake loser does not even have the icon that indicates photo verified but still listed as a couple on their profile not photo verified but still allowed to broadcast from a cam because he has paid his yearly subscription These fakes seem to be allowed to exist on Fab as a couple then get off deceiving us all exposing them selfeves jacking off on cam because they are a paid up site supporter (wich in the end are big tame wasters for those actually looking for couples) Any one else find these low life fake time wasters so very frustrating as well as I do? What say you? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Give people a timeout for posting games on the wrong forum. Including a timeout for anyone that joins in " Steve & Beth when I come across a game posted in a foarm directory room I'm assuming when I read ( I'm in ) those folks would be into playing that game, even in this case I do respect others filters & only replie & play not by direct messaging them but use the quote button to play along What rooms do you think games SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be allowed in? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you block someone it also blocks in forums too. That a fairly big issue. When a profile is reported ie we met a guy claiming to be 20+ years younger than he was and he became fairly aggressive, profile reported and nothing done" That's horrible that happened to you I think the moderators need to look closer at this issue ,people that get very aggressive because they being deceitful & not getting away with it sure makes this site not so fun that's for sure If it's not fun then it is a terrible waste of time | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you block someone it also blocks in forums too. That a fairly big issue. When a profile is reported ie we met a guy claiming to be 20+ years younger than he was and he became fairly aggressive, profile reported and nothing done" Why even have a report buttun if nothing is not done about it doesn't make sense | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What say you?" I'd add a button on the profile that had to be clicked before a message could be sent to the person. If they can't be bothered to read a profile they shouldn't be allowed to message. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A like and dislike button/function for comments on the forums. " Please elaborate ferther for us, on how you think these button functions on comments can be improved | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What say you? I'd add a button on the profile that had to be clicked before a message could be sent to the person. If they can't be bothered to read a profile they shouldn't be allowed to message." I think that's great food for thought for the moderators and I have to say I absolutely adore & think the above folks status update on their profile is so hilarious Like so many things in life humor does go a long,long way to get a true glimpse of folks personalitys, and I do think we all do agree we are so lucky such fun humorous folks are Fab members | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not all are fake. As a couple. They don't have to be attached to each other 24/7. This account isn't photo verified. But we are a couple. I don't cam much. But if and when I do. It would be me the Male part on the cam. As our lass has a couples account for her to use in chat at the same time. When she uses her cam, it is always her on her own. Would you also say she is fake as you won't ever see me on her cam? There are plenty of couples account where you will only ever see the female part of the couple on their cam. I'm yet to see anyone complain about that. " Yes true ,but when I see their listed as a couple I do expect to see a couple when you click on there cam button not just some guy stroking him self, | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not a lot really. I think it works fine as it is. Maybe make the veried filter tighter so a photo Veri doesn't allow people to message if you have it on. But apart from that I've no issues really with how I use fab. Filters work wonders for making it easier and I just concentrate on my own journey rather than what others do. " I totally love your frank upbeat totally open-minded attitude about this site & it's functions, it does let us know how intelligent you truely are | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not all are fake. As a couple. They don't have to be attached to each other 24/7. This account isn't photo verified. But we are a couple. I don't cam much. But if and when I do. It would be me the Male part on the cam. As our lass has a couples account for her to use in chat at the same time. When she uses her cam, it is always her on her own. Would you also say she is fake as you won't ever see me on her cam? There are plenty of couples account where you will only ever see the female part of the couple on their cam. I'm yet to see anyone complain about that. " That's probably because 99.9% of the folks on this site are eather Males,& or couples that enjoy watching weman being super sensual,therefore extremely sexy wile enjoying themselves being seriously adored & appreciated | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Make it £100 / £200 a year subscription to help reduce the amount of fake accounts " That might work to reduce some guys from this list but there would still be a percentage of dudes that wouldn't mind paying a lot more so they can continue to be deceitful I truely think that's what they get off on more then anything ealse | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What say you?" liars & fakes come up on this foram posting shouldn't be surprising | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes true ,but when I see their listed as a couple I do expect to see a couple when you click on there cam button not just some guy stroking him self, " When I put the lotto on I expect to win, but that isn't the case most of the time. Just because something isn't what you want or expect doesn't make it wrong. Each to their own. It is easy to click off a cam if you don't like what you see. Others may like it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also if see a man's cock is so incredibly disgusting it's probably best not to seek couples out at all and just stick to single females Let's be fair even in a fully straight MFM your going to see either the guy or his Mrs wanking he cock at some stage in the meet. KJ " And if DP is included in said MFM. There will no doubt be tennis played between balls. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also if see a man's cock is so incredibly disgusting it's probably best not to seek couples out at all and just stick to single females Let's be fair even in a fully straight MFM your going to see either the guy or his Mrs wanking he cock at some stage in the meet. KJ And if DP is included in said MFM. There will no doubt be tennis played between balls. " Exactly which is why the hyper hetros who get angry and disgusted at the slightest male to male contact as the absolute last types of guys you'd want in a straight MFM meet. Give me the straight guys who are totally comfortable in there sexuality and around others any times please. Just to add as my male half I'm effectively straight never done anything with a guy directly or have any desire to do so. However I love 3sums 4sums and moresomes its what's swinging is all about for me. I will happy engage In DP, DVP and fuck licking so for those reasons alone I put bi curious as there's nothing else appropriate on fab. I also understand when playing in MFM there's times when there is contact between the guys e.g in one inventive and intensive spit roast the other guy had to stable himself by resting his forarm on my shoulder. No biggie the position required it. That's exactly why I think the hyper straight or the aggressive straight should really stick to 1 on 1s with females. We certainly don't want to be around those types anyway. KJ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also if see a man's cock is so incredibly disgusting it's probably best not to seek couples out at all and just stick to single females Let's be fair even in a fully straight MFM your going to see either the guy or his Mrs wanking he cock at some stage in the meet. KJ And if DP is included in said MFM. There will no doubt be tennis played between balls. Exactly which is why the hyper hetros who get angry and disgusted at the slightest male to male contact as the absolute last types of guys you'd want in a straight MFM meet. Give me the straight guys who are totally comfortable in there sexuality and around others any times please. Just to add as my male half I'm effectively straight never done anything with a guy directly or have any desire to do so. However I love 3sums 4sums and moresomes its what's swinging is all about for me. I will happy engage In DP, DVP and fuck licking so for those reasons alone I put bi curious as there's nothing else appropriate on fab. I also understand when playing in MFM there's times when there is contact between the guys e.g in one inventive and intensive spit roast the other guy had to stable himself by resting his forarm on my shoulder. No biggie the position required it. That's exactly why I think the hyper straight or the aggressive straight should really stick to 1 on 1s with females. We certainly don't want to be around those types anyway. KJ" Some very great insight and some real food for thought thanks so much | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you block someone it also blocks in forums too. That a fairly big issue. When a profile is reported ie we met a guy claiming to be 20+ years younger than he was and he became fairly aggressive, profile reported and nothing done" Everyday is a school day. Did not know this | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Give people a timeout for posting games on the wrong forum. Including a timeout for anyone that joins in Steve & Beth when I come across a game posted in a foarm directory room I'm assuming when I read ( I'm in ) those folks would be into playing that game, even in this case I do respect others filters & only replie & play not by direct messaging them but use the quote button to play along What rooms do you think games SHOULD or SHOULD NOT be allowed in? " The 'Games' forum would seem a good place. And who is Beth? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Make it £100 / £200 a year subscription to help reduce the amount of fake accounts " Its a great idea that anyone would think it would at least greatly reduce it. Sadly in practice it doesn't work. Before Fab really got going was on other sites one which was £16 per month and one that was £25. Both were riddled with fake accounts, the more expensive one suffering most. As odd as it is to the rest of us it seems there is always a contingent of men who 'get off' on posing as women/couples. I suggest everyone on all profiles should be photo-verified at least. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Restricted access and picture uploads for unverified profiles. Meet verifications having a different symbol to camera verifications. More genuinely bisexual women. Virus forum thread to be deleted to allow swinging to be the only topic to talk about rather than armchair scientists who study reddit for technical terms and scaremongering on a daily basis. Profile automatically deleted after 6 months if not at least photo verified by then. " Those suggestions do really make a lot of sense | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We'd like to see a function, that if a hot single lady looks at our profile, she has to meet us by law.. otherwise, she gets sent to the gallows!!! Simple one to implicate? " Very hilarious thanks so much for the chuckle | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Everyone verified. One week free - then pay - as prices are now. No blank profiles- deleted after 12 hours. " Yes… this | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Make it £100 / £200 a year subscription to help reduce the amount of fake accounts " Unfortunately charging for a site like this means it would cease to be a swinger site. Let's face it, if you want an expensive dating site there are plenty about, if you want a sex dating site to rip you off there are loads of those which pretend to be swinger sites. The biggest issue with this site is non swingers just here for sex dating and charging won't get rid of them, it is more likely to get rid of the genuine swingers | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Make it £100 / £200 a year subscription to help reduce the amount of fake accounts " Not sure how many will be able to afford it..swinging should be for all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Make it £100 / £200 a year subscription to help reduce the amount of fake accounts Unfortunately charging for a site like this means it would cease to be a swinger site. Let's face it, if you want an expensive dating site there are plenty about, if you want a sex dating site to rip you off there are loads of those which pretend to be swinger sites. The biggest issue with this site is non swingers just here for sex dating and charging won't get rid of them, it is more likely to get rid of the genuine swingers " I disagree. Doesn't have to be a lot but having a small yearly fee would get rid of all the fake accounts instantly. If you're willing to part with the small fee it shows your actual intent. Would stop guys pretending to be ladies and would stop ladies starting accounts just for a chat. Would also stop people having multiple accounts which I find a weird one. A back up fab account? Pretty self involved Isn't everyone that's not in a cpl a non swinger by definition? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you block someone it also blocks in forums too. That a fairly big issue. When a profile is reported ie we met a guy claiming to be 20+ years younger than he was and he became fairly aggressive, profile reported and nothing done Why even have a report buttun if nothing is not done about it doesn't make sense" the report button is just there to make people think something is being done , but if the site had to do anything about all reports reported it would look negative and make people wonder just my take | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Make it £100 / £200 a year subscription to help reduce the amount of fake accounts Unfortunately charging for a site like this means it would cease to be a swinger site. Let's face it, if you want an expensive dating site there are plenty about, if you want a sex dating site to rip you off there are loads of those which pretend to be swinger sites. The biggest issue with this site is non swingers just here for sex dating and charging won't get rid of them, it is more likely to get rid of the genuine swingers I disagree. Doesn't have to be a lot but having a small yearly fee would get rid of all the fake accounts instantly. If you're willing to part with the small fee it shows your actual intent. Would stop guys pretending to be ladies and would stop ladies starting accounts just for a chat. Would also stop people having multiple accounts which I find a weird one. A back up fab account? Pretty self involved Isn't everyone that's not in a cpl a non swinger by definition? " So only people with spare cash can be swingers and no time-wasting fantasist have money to burn? Really?? People pay subscriptions for all manner of things they never/rarely use from gym memberships to wine clubs. People who get their kicks catfishing others wouldn't bat an eyelid at £10 a month and conversely many active swingers would cease using the site if forced to pay. Single women generally get into clubs for free so why would they pay to join a site? Fees don't stop 'fake' accounts. The usual result when sites charge is that members have a heightened sense of expectation and entitlement. Those two things are bad enough when a site is free and don't need any encouragement. And no. Swinging isn't just for couples. That's wife swapping. Swinging has always welcomed single people. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |