Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Has anyone else found a lack of consistency in the approval of photographs? I follow all site rules regarding posting of Photos and sometimes they are accepted and sometimes they are rejected, with no measure of consistency. Would anyone else want a 'Photographer Verification' ? - clarifying that YES indeed this person knows how to use a camera and that all photos posted by them are genuine. Moreover any photos posted on other peoples profiles (people they have played with 'Verified') that the photographers profile name be embedded with in the photograph, thus clarifying that the photo is indeed genuine. I enjoy taking photos and find it part of integral experience in this world of kink, sharing these photos is a way of describing ones physicality, attitude, sexual proclivities and general kinkiness. But when it is mitigated by in-consistent approval of photographs one has to question the photo approval moderation currently being applied on this site. Isn't it high time the photo approval moderation gets a upgrade? --------------------------------------------- Email sent to Site Owners: I have an issue with the acceptance of photographs. I work in media and know how to use a camera. All the photos i have ever posted are taken by me... please see my verifications. There is no consistency regarding 'Approval' of photographs. Some are accepted and some are rejected, with no meter for measure. I see people posting photos where photographs of their children in plain _iew (on the wall) in the background... I've seen photos where children's toys are present in the background. I've seen photos that are blatantly ripped from the internet (ok all be it not photo verified) I've seen photos of toys laid out on a bed, with no people present in the photo... etc. The approval of photos seems to vary on who ever is moderating them when they are posted. I've said it before, but i think it is high time that 'Fab' has a verification for people who are known photographers. Simply put - based on verifications, perhaps 3 verifications of 01. Yes this person took these photos (email of consent) 02. Yes we have met (meet verification) and 03. that a photo of participants together holding up user names on a piece of paper (like a couple, but not posted for the site, just to verify genuine) Perhaps after receiving 3 of these types of verifications a profile can be 'Photographer Verified' Icon of a Camera on their profile. What do i need to do... get letters of consent / recommendations from those i have taken photos with while playing? Please consider what i have written and reply with more then 'please see the photo rules' Regards Creative_Edge NB: I'm going to post this email in the forum, to see if any other members feel this is an issue. " I see where your frustration comes from - but i don't see there being a massive issue with getting photos submitted that have been taken playing with others. Many of mine include those i've met - and many that i've met have chosen to post photos that I have taken for them (and often been in!) with no problems getting them approved. By simply following the logical rules - i.e. hiding identities and visible tattoos/easily identifiable marks - there is no reason a picture should be rejected. Obviously if you're posting on your profile - you hide them. If they are posting on theirs - you (or they) adjust the photo to hide you! As for the fakes and those blatantly ripped from the net - i've found dozens via tineye and reverse google image search - and simply reported them to admin. 9 times out of 10 the picture in question (and often the profile) vanishes. Over complicating things will simply slow down the approval of pictures - and as for the worry about people posting out of date pics - if you're worried then ask to see them on cam - far harder to fake! And as for allowing your details on others photos via watermark or other means - apart from a slight ego boost if others fab them - what would this really achieve? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Not sure we understand your aim here? Are you saying you want permission to post photographs of other people, that do not have you in the photo, as long as you have their consent, to show off your photography skills? " No i'm not suggesting that that i should be able to post photos of other people that i am not in... i follow the site rules regarding, protection of identity (face, tattoos, distinguishing features) I find that even when i have protected all that - the photo gets accepted sometimes and or rejected. What i am suggesting is that after a certain amount of verifications ( be it photo related) that it is acknowledged that photos by that Photographer be accepted on basis of consistency and legitimacy of the users over all meet verifications i.e. feed back. Is it wrong to want acknowledgement for something you created. If you want to call it showing off, by all means... i like to show off. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Not sure we understand your aim here? Are you saying you want permission to post photographs of other people, that do not have you in the photo, as long as you have their consent, to show off your photography skills? No i'm not suggesting that that i should be able to post photos of other people that i am not in... i follow the site rules regarding, protection of identity (face, tattoos, distinguishing features) I find that even when i have protected all that - the photo gets accepted sometimes and or rejected. What i am suggesting is that after a certain amount of verifications ( be it photo related) that it is acknowledged that photos by that Photographer be accepted on basis of consistency and legitimacy of the users over all meet verifications i.e. feed back. Is it wrong to want acknowledgement for something you created. If you want to call it showing off, by all means... i like to show off." Personally... we only watermark photos we post on photography websites. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Not sure we understand your aim here? Are you saying you want permission to post photographs of other people, that do not have you in the photo, as long as you have their consent, to show off your photography skills? No i'm not suggesting that that i should be able to post photos of other people that i am not in... i follow the site rules regarding, protection of identity (face, tattoos, distinguishing features) I find that even when i have protected all that - the photo gets accepted sometimes and or rejected. What i am suggesting is that after a certain amount of verifications ( be it photo related) that it is acknowledged that photos by that Photographer be accepted on basis of consistency and legitimacy of the users over all meet verifications i.e. feed back. Is it wrong to want acknowledgement for something you created. If you want to call it showing off, by all means... i like to show off." Yes - I think it is wrong. For example one of your pics currently is split in two - and the left half contains a single, solitary woman. Profile pics are meant to give others an opportunity to _iew the profile owner - not see how good/bad/indifferent they are with a camera. If people wish you to take photos for them for use on their own profile then thats fine. But having pictures of others on yours without you being in them serves no purpose but to illustrate that you may have at some point met that person - and will only lead to more accusations of simply downloading random photos from the internet. If people want to see your work - whats wrong with emailing pictures to them? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Rules are rules if you put up a pic of a single female on your profile with out you in it, it should be rejected even if you have permission as YOU are not in the pic ..... Like your 1st pic ,so im thinking ... you dont follow or no the rules " If you look at the photo it is split into two photographs which where taken the same night. The one on the left is her on her, admittedly, the one on the right is her with me. The photos where taken as a series. I wouldn't post the photo of her on her own by her self as that would be against the rules. Moreover her identity is protected... i don't see how i am violating any rules, by applying artistic license. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Rules are rules if you put up a pic of a single female on your profile with out you in it, it should be rejected even if you have permission as YOU are not in the pic ..... Like your 1st pic ,so im thinking ... you dont follow or no the rules If you look at the photo it is split into two photographs which where taken the same night. The one on the left is her on her, admittedly, the one on the right is her with me. The photos where taken as a series. I wouldn't post the photo of her on her own by her self as that would be against the rules. Moreover her identity is protected... i don't see how i am violating any rules, by applying artistic license. " Attatching two pictures together - one containing someone else on their own is quite obviously violating the rules - whether you have her consent or not. Unless of course your profile changes to a couples one with her as the other party. Sticking two pics together is hardly 'artistic licence'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can see its split in two BUT on 1 half there is a female by herself like you say ( its against rules) why not crop it like every body else does " OK so then by that judgement all photos have to be one photo and can't be a montage in any form. I've seen loads of photos where it has been split into multiple parts. My point is in-consitency over all on the site! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I can see its split in two BUT on 1 half there is a female by herself like you say ( its against rules) why not crop it like every body else does OK so then by that judgement all photos have to be one photo and can't be a montage in any form. I've seen loads of photos where it has been split into multiple parts. My point is in-consitency over all on the site!" Split photos/montages are fine - so long as they contain the profile owner in each part - with or without others, and if others are present they cannot be identified. The rules aren't rocket science surely? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As my other post on photo rules says, I do think pic rules need to be clarified. Including those who have a single profile, I do not think that a playmate should be included. (Sorry to piss on people's chips) but some single profiles take it too far. For example, a single male profile, with the tip of his cock in the mouth of a female, with just her eyes blanked out defeats the object of a single male profile. The same as a single female with a big cock about to insert into her foof, when it is mainly the cock showing rather than the ladies foof. I understand that pic mods have a hard task, but sometimes it appears they dont care and just click on accept when it should be rejected. I have reported pics which were removed, to find them uploaded and in the most fab'dpics 2 days later. Surely if a pic has been removed before some sort of warning should appear to the pic mods????" For example, a single male profile, with the tip of his cock in the mouth of a female, with just her eyes blanked out defeats the object of a single male profile... why shud it? its his cock and you carnt see her full face, he met her so why not show it on his profile ... he not breaking any rules same goes for single females and tip cocks on pussy.. the way you looking at it we not allowed any pics with a female in (if you a single male)or a female in a pic (if you a single fem)if they have takin the pic while on a meet sure thats is clarified.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As my other post on photo rules says, I do think pic rules need to be clarified. Including those who have a single profile, I do not think that a playmate should be included. (Sorry to piss on people's chips) but some single profiles take it too far. For example, a single male profile, with the tip of his cock in the mouth of a female, with just her eyes blanked out defeats the object of a single male profile. The same as a single female with a big cock about to insert into her foof, when it is mainly the cock showing rather than the ladies foof. I understand that pic mods have a hard task, but sometimes it appears they dont care and just click on accept when it should be rejected. I have reported pics which were removed, to find them uploaded and in the most fab'dpics 2 days later. Surely if a pic has been removed before some sort of warning should appear to the pic mods????" I'm afraid I completely disagree.My profile reflects my activities and my interests.Its there to get the interests of others who have the same interests as me.If we had a single only rule in pics..the site would be filled with generic pics of cocks and fannys.And why should a couple have more right than me to express my sexuality and freedoms withing a sexual site? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think if a single account has a picture with someone they met they should be able to upload it as long as the single person(owner of profile) is also in it. " Problem is how does the image mod know you have permission to show them on your profile? How do image mods know if you met person a or b? No use saying those who have verified you or not, as some people don't like to show verifications? All our pics that show others, are in our friends ONLY gallery, they show H playing without the need to show others the faces of others she has played with, why would anyone _iewing our profile want to see the faces/tattoos etc of those we have played with? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think if a single account has a picture with someone they met they should be able to upload it as long as the single person(owner of profile) is also in it. Problem is how does the image mod know you have permission to show them on your profile? How do image mods know if you met person a or b? No use saying those who have verified you or not, as some people don't like to show verifications? All our pics that show others, are in our friends ONLY gallery, they show H playing without the need to show others the faces of others she has played with, why would anyone _iewing our profile want to see the faces/tattoos etc of those we have played with?" By creating the tag option, admin can pend approval until person also in pic has confirmed the tag request. They can then decide whether pic goes in public, friends, private, or not on their profile at all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think if a single account has a picture with someone they met they should be able to upload it as long as the single person(owner of profile) is also in it. Problem is how does the image mod know you have permission to show them on your profile? How do image mods know if you met person a or b? No use saying those who have verified you or not, as some people don't like to show verifications? All our pics that show others, are in our friends ONLY gallery, they show H playing without the need to show others the faces of others she has played with, why would anyone _iewing our profile want to see the faces/tattoos etc of those we have played with? By creating the tag option, admin can pend approval until person also in pic has confirmed the tag request. They can then decide whether pic goes in public, friends, private, or not on their profile at all. " So much the same as I said earlier? But as I also said implementing this may not be too easy. The site already has loads of members who appear to be happy with the Status Quo in regard to this.. and admin may have other prorities with regard to other ideas/requests to add value to the site! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As my other post on photo rules says, I do think pic rules need to be clarified. Including those who have a single profile, I do not think that a playmate should be included. (Sorry to piss on people's chips) but some single profiles take it too far. For example, a single male profile, with the tip of his cock in the mouth of a female, with just her eyes blanked out defeats the object of a single male profile. The same as a single female with a big cock about to insert into her foof, when it is mainly the cock showing rather than the ladies foof. I understand that pic mods have a hard task, but sometimes it appears they dont care and just click on accept when it should be rejected. I have reported pics which were removed, to find them uploaded and in the most fab'dpics 2 days later. Surely if a pic has been removed before some sort of warning should appear to the pic mods???? For example, a single male profile, with the tip of his cock in the mouth of a female, with just her eyes blanked out defeats the object of a single male profile... why shud it? its his cock and you carnt see her full face, he met her so why not show it on his profile ... he not breaking any rules same goes for single females and tip cocks on pussy.. the way you looking at it we not allowed any pics with a female in (if you a single male)or a female in a pic (if you a single fem)if they have takin the pic while on a meet sure thats is clarified.... " Sorry, what I meant didn't come across right. What I meant was that, sure put pics up of meets etc but make them balanced, so its not just, for example, a woman with her boobs covered in cum. and only have that one shot as a public pic. Also, as others have mentioned, how do admin/pic mods actually know the other people involved have given their permission? My original point was the pic rules are very grey and far from black and white as I think they could be. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'm afraid I completely disagree.My profile reflects my activities and my interests.Its there to get the interests of others who have the same interests as me.If we had a single only rule in pics..the site would be filled with generic pics of cocks and fannys.And why should a couple have more right than me to express my sexuality and freedoms withing a sexual site?" You're right, I didn't express my opinion clearly. For your interests, (and I do love your pics) I think your pics do show more of your talent, BUT you have pics of yourself up and in those pics too. My points were when it was just the pic of the wrong person or more of the meet than the actual profile owner as in a slight glimpse at the tip of his cock for instance, or his cum on a woman. My other point was the consent issue. Hope that makes sense, it makes sense in my brain but cant get the right wording to my fingers | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" I'm afraid I completely disagree.My profile reflects my activities and my interests.Its there to get the interests of others who have the same interests as me.If we had a single only rule in pics..the site would be filled with generic pics of cocks and fannys.And why should a couple have more right than me to express my sexuality and freedoms withing a sexual site? You're right, I didn't express my opinion clearly. For your interests, (and I do love your pics) I think your pics do show more of your talent, BUT you have pics of yourself up and in those pics too. My points were when it was just the pic of the wrong person or more of the meet than the actual profile owner as in a slight glimpse at the tip of his cock for instance, or his cum on a woman. My other point was the consent issue. Hope that makes sense, it makes sense in my brain but cant get the right wording to my fingers " awww ya sweety...get ur lips round my cock for a pic! xxxxxxxxxx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" awww ya sweety...get ur lips round my cock for a pic! xxxxxxxxxx" think thats all Im good for for today xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |