Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is ,but sadly people can get round it by adding a pic and then deleting it. Apparently if they have no public puc, but a pic set to private, the no public puc filter doesn't work. Might as well not have that privacy setting. Winston " It does work in a fashion. What people do is just set the picture to 'public' to be able to message you then after they have done so set it back to 'private' ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is ,but sadly people can get round it by adding a pic and then deleting it. Apparently if they have no public puc, but a pic set to private, the no public puc filter doesn't work. Might as well not have that privacy setting. Winston It does work in a fashion. What people do is just set the picture to 'public' to be able to message you then after they have done so set it back to 'private' ![]() They do that too. But what I said is also correct, its been tested between our profile and someone else's. Winston | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone else wish there was a message filter for profiles with no profile picture? Or not pictures at all for that matter. " Guess it's so easy to get around that filter. Might be quite a lot of effort to fix it. Is it really worth having? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |