
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
| Back to forum list |
| Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
| Jump to newest |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is ,but sadly people can get round it by adding a pic and then deleting it. Apparently if they have no public puc, but a pic set to private, the no public puc filter doesn't work. Might as well not have that privacy setting. Winston " It does work in a fashion. What people do is just set the picture to 'public' to be able to message you then after they have done so set it back to 'private' | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is ,but sadly people can get round it by adding a pic and then deleting it. Apparently if they have no public puc, but a pic set to private, the no public puc filter doesn't work. Might as well not have that privacy setting. Winston It does work in a fashion. What people do is just set the picture to 'public' to be able to message you then after they have done so set it back to 'private' They do that too. But what I said is also correct, its been tested between our profile and someone else's. Winston | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone else wish there was a message filter for profiles with no profile picture? Or not pictures at all for that matter. " Guess it's so easy to get around that filter. Might be quite a lot of effort to fix it. Is it really worth having? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |