FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Verification after 6 weeks

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?

Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Harsh....for single men more so as they sometimes struggle to get meets early on.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

In anyway -

So webcam, photo etc.

Just so you get a feel for who is "real"

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ilandlarryCouple
over a year ago

more north lincs than mids!


"In anyway -

So webcam, photo etc.

Just so you get a feel for who is "real""

some people don't like the idea of being photo verified. Each to their own.

Some people don't use the chat room so can't/won't get cam verified.

Harsh in my opinion. If you see someone who has been on longer than you think is acceptable without verifications then just pass them by

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Most people don't take any notice of webcam veri's anyway.

I personally think that people should be left to use their profile how they wish.

Calling people trash for not using the site the same way as you think they should is a bit much I think.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

No disrespect intended for the word "trash" wrong choice of adjective.

I agree with your points, you can always pass them.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

http://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

This might be the right time to mentione mail filters

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

without the e on mention.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

point taken

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *andcCouple
over a year ago

London and Cheshire

We just pass the by

We would like to see people who have not logged in for say 3 months not to show in search results.. cannot see the point in showing them.

Also if someone has been away for a while like servicemen (and women) going to afgan etc.. soon as they return and log in they would show up again.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Those who havn't logged on for a hile will fall don to the bottom of the list, so I suppose we can scroll as far as we want

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

ok who nicked my W's

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Think that would be harsh, if a persons a site supporter then should it matter? I'm looking for an local fb, it could take days or mths till the right lady came along , the filters can single out the folk you don't want surely that should be enough ...

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *xodussxMan
over a year ago

sheffield

Who are we to suggest that if no verifications after 6weeks people should be removed???? Will you pay back their membership? And someone may join the site just for fun and talk in the forum and never plan to meet

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Fabswingers covers many different sexual areas , its a great site it just wouldn't be right to start excluding folk who don't meet a certain pre-fixed profile off how different people wanna use the site.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"ok who nicked my W's"

I hear you like your W's.... Willies that is...

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Probably a bit harsh!im a fusspot and have only had one meet this time round so far.Plus i work shifts so meets have to be arranged around them.I think alot of us genuine folk on here are in the same position.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *andcCouple
over a year ago

London and Cheshire


"Think that would be harsh, if a persons a site supporter then should it matter? I'm looking for an local fb, it could take days or mths till the right lady came along , the filters can single out the folk you don't want surely that should be enough ..."

Whats being a site supporter got to do with verificaction? Just because you pay a few quid doesn't make you more genuine.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo


"ok who nicked my W's

I hear you like your W's.... Willies that is... "

You heard right

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *alcmarCouple
over a year ago

Malaga, Spain now ex High Barnet


"Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?

Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?

"

I pretty much agree with the aim - but think six weeks is a bit short. Personally we don't really look at anyone who has been on longer than six months and hasn't been verified by meeting (we feel they are either phonies, so up themselves they wouldn't be interested in meeting us, or simply one of the many who talk about meeting rather than actually meeting). We're also doubtful about those couples or ladies who only have a verification from one bloke - and those who don't show their verifications.

But it is pretty much gut feel isn't it? If you don't feel comfortable with the messages you are getting from someone or if they aren't willing to provide a mobile number to verify there is a female member of the "couple" then politely apologise for wasting their time and break the contact.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *uckscouple2007Couple
over a year ago

Bucks


"But it is pretty much gut feel isn't it? If you don't feel comfortable with the messages you are getting from someone or if they aren't willing to provide a mobile number to verify there is a female member of the "couple" then politely apologise for wasting their time and break the contact."

that is the crux of it.. gut feel - if you are not confident then just move on to the next profile - dont waste your own time

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 31/08/12 01:47:08]

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?

Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?

"

bloody hell hes only been here 4 weeks and hes trying to get people booted off already, he'll be ruling the world after a year

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Harsh....for single men more so as they sometimes struggle to get meets early on."

Took me about the same as I've 2 jobs and meeting takes planning plus was nervous

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"In anyway -

So webcam, photo etc.

Just so you get a feel for who is "real""

Not everyone has a webcam and just because some has been picture verified, doesn't prove they are genuine

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?

Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?

I pretty much agree with the aim - but think six weeks is a bit short. Personally we don't really look at anyone who has been on longer than six months and hasn't been verified by meeting (we feel they are either phonies, so up themselves they wouldn't be interested in meeting us, or simply one of the many who talk about meeting rather than actually meeting). We're also doubtful about those couples or ladies who only have a verification from one bloke - and those who don't show their verifications.

But it is pretty much gut feel isn't it? If you don't feel comfortable with the messages you are getting from someone or if they aren't willing to provide a mobile number to verify there is a female member of the "couple" then politely apologise for wasting their time and break the contact."

Some people hide their verifications because they have perhaps been stalked, had someone go through their verifications slagging them off to the author or slagged the off because of either who they have played with or because they have a long verification list. So not all phonies or fakes or trash as the op says

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who are we to suggest that if no verifications after 6weeks people should be removed???? Will you pay back their membership? And someone may join the site just for fun and talk in the forum and never plan to meet

"

Don't forget those who only meet at clubs and use this site to keep in touch with those who they have met

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ikkiBWoman
over a year ago

Falkirk

Its an idea but one that would be hard to enforce. I met a guy who had been on for 7 months with no veri due to the fact he hadn't been on due to being in a relationship, so going by this he would be booted for it.

Just think you need to understand people may have reasons for not meeting in 6 weeks/months and it doesn't mean they are automatically fake or timewasting.

I haven't met anyone for a wee while, well no one new and I've been happy browsing forums and going on chat. Everyones on here for diff reasons so just gotta put up with any fakes out there

And a wee extra, I once came across someone with about 20 verifications on their profile and they were a sick abusive twit so even the veri system isn't fool proof and if you give a time limit to get veri there would be a lot more fake verying going on

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Its an idea but one that would be hard to enforce. I met a guy who had been on for 7 months with no veri due to the fact he hadn't been on due to being in a relationship, so going by this he would be booted for it.

Just think you need to understand people may have reasons for not meeting in 6 weeks/months and it doesn't mean they are automatically fake or timewasting.

I haven't met anyone for a wee while, well no one new and I've been happy browsing forums and going on chat. Everyones on here for diff reasons so just gotta put up with any fakes out there

And a wee extra, I once came across someone with about 20 verifications on their profile and they were a sick abusive twit so even the veri system isn't fool proof and if you give a time limit to get veri there would be a lot more fake verying going on"

nah its a daft idea really, see if you like to see people verified within 6 weeks to show they not time wasters or they get kicked off the site then you arnt going to see anymore who has been on for longer than 6 weeks with no verification

people will just either beg for fake verifications so they dont get banned, and people will probally help them out and do it for them - or they will simply make new accounts

at the moment the systems perfect for you coz you can put a filter on unverified people messaging, but you can also see how long someone has been on the site for and if they have been verified, if they havent you can make your own judgement

but adding this feature will take away the facility to make that judgement

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Most people don't take any notice of webcam veri's anyway.

I personally think that people should be left to use their profile how they wish.

Calling people trash for not using the site the same way as you think they should is a bit much I think."

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *xodussxMan
over a year ago

sheffield


"Who are we to suggest that if no verifications after 6weeks people should be removed???? Will you pay back their membership? And someone may join the site just for fun and talk in the forum and never plan to meet

Don't forget those who only meet at clubs and use this site to keep in touch with those who they have met"

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I spend months at sea so we would have been kicked off if we didnt get a verification before I left.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm genuine, but not verified...been on a while longer now.....chatted to a few folk but not met yet....so still looking anyone interested get back for a chat . Seems its just not as easy as some people think to get a real meet....

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?

Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?

"

Harsh and totally unnecessary because of all the reasons quoted above

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let us just except this site for what it is

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm genuine, but not verified...been on a while longer now.....chatted to a few folk but not met yet....so still looking anyone interested get back for a chat . Seems its just not as easy as some people think to get a real meet...."

But your profile says verified genuine profile?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

right as a single guy , struggles to get meet if not verified, let me put this to you , as a single guy not verified , meet a new women on here also not verified , hoew do we verify our meet ......... simply not fair !!!!

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who are we to suggest that if no verifications after 6weeks people should be removed???? Will you pay back their membership? And someone may join the site just for fun and talk in the forum and never plan to meet

Don't forget those who only meet at clubs and use this site to keep in touch with those who they have met "

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

As this has now gone from a perfectly good feedback question to questioning the mans grammar then maybe time to shut it....especially as the man saw many peoples points way up the thread.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
back to top