FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Couple identification

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

So this probably seems rather niche but it's strange fabs doesn't allow for trans or poly couples? This probably make sense 10 years ago but it's a little old fashioned now and would be good for couples who can declare they are trans or list a poly/thruple couple.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tockport 69Couple
over a year ago

Stockport

go on a TV & TS site keep this site for swingers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

TV and TS can swing too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mma_EvansTV/TS
over a year ago

Colchester


"TV and TS can swing too"

^ This

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *etitesaraTV/TS
over a year ago

rochdale


"go on a TV & TS site keep this site for swingers"

Excuse me???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"go on a TV & TS site keep this site for swingers"

You don't need to be so scared. Nobody's forcing you to interact with anyone on a site you don't want to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"go on a TV & TS site keep this site for swingers"

Your post is totally out of order and unacceptable.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hesblokeMan
over a year ago

Derbyshire village


"TV and TS can swing too"

You'd think this wouldn't be a surprise to folk, wouldn't you, really?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Probably just jealous that they don’t look as good in knickers.

Hijacking the thread every so slightly-a lot.

It’s also about time TS isnt used/is a option, and FtM, MtF is an option instead.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Great idea, was going to suggest this too x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andi_kinkygramTV/TS
over a year ago

Edinburgh

TV couple option has been requested before, can't recall ever seeing an official explanation as to why not.

Cx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't disagree with ops comment but I reckon admins have to be careful about introducing too much granularity in how people define themselves. Because that increases how many search criteria you have. We'll all end up in our own little silos if we get to the point where you can choose too many options...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I don't disagree with ops comment but I reckon admins have to be careful about introducing too much granularity in how people define themselves. Because that increases how many search criteria you have. We'll all end up in our own little silos if we get to the point where you can choose too many options... "

I mean, possibly, but there's definitely extras where the search is too limited. If there were options to search for certain body types (seeing as we have to input that field in on the profile anyway), don't think that be a bad edition for example?

Obviously if the choice was too granular then it wouldn't work. But I doubt we'll see anything like that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't disagree with ops comment but I reckon admins have to be careful about introducing too much granularity in how people define themselves. Because that increases how many search criteria you have. We'll all end up in our own little silos if we get to the point where you can choose too many options... "

And that.. would be beautiful

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top