Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lol 470 fabs in 3 hours =no 2 spot" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lol 470 fabs in 3 hours =no 2 spot" Just had a quick look at the Top Photos and the current No 2. picture has 2,384 fabs - which seems about right. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lol 470 fabs in 3 hours =no 2 spot Just had a quick look at the Top Photos and the current No 2. picture has 2,384 fabs - which seems about right." over 12 hours yes | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lol 470 fabs in 3 hours =no 2 spot Just had a quick look at the Top Photos and the current No 2. picture has 2,384 fabs - which seems about right.over 12 hours yes " But that is the measure by which the Top Photos works. It's not a matter of the rate at which a pic is getting fabs, it's how many in a 12 hour period. 2,384 is a lot higher than 470 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lol 470 fabs in 3 hours =no 2 spot" It's over 12 hours. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How is it the mods fault you only got 400 n odd fabs??" I think the inference was that somehow the mods had kept them from their rightful position in the list rather than limiting fabs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lol 470 fabs in 3 hours =no 2 spot" Lol, did you win anything ? Can't believe this . People are fighting for top spots for pics lol . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How is it the mods fault you only got 400 n odd fabs?? I think the inference was that somehow the mods had kept them from their rightful position in the list rather than limiting fabs " Ohhh . Who has the time to complain about silly stuff .. the mind boggles | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Methinks someone is trying to get someone to pay for their subscription again, lol. Did it last month I underand has done in the past,oh shame they aren't getting enough fabs to encourage..lol" Eh? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Methinks someone is trying to get someone to pay for their subscription again, lol. Did it last month I underand has done in the past,oh shame they aren't getting enough fabs to encourage..lol Eh?" It's not uncommon to see a status update lamenting that their site supporter is running out and would anyone like to pay for a new one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why do people care about having their pics at the top spots? " makes them feel special and better than the rest ? I dunno maybe the top babes would give some enlightenment | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Methinks someone is trying to get someone to pay for their subscription again, lol. Did it last month I underand has done in the past,oh shame they aren't getting enough fabs to encourage..lol" Who has? The op? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |