FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback

Unverified for over a year....

Jump to newest
 

By *awandBare OP   Woman
over a year ago

Oxford

Unverified for a year and or not site supporters should be removed. I get that people take their time but it would out the pic collecters???

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *etwifeandhim69Couple
over a year ago

Darlington

I agree in principle (though I can see why someone would want your pictures.

On one hand I think a time limit should be put on unverified accounts (say a month + pass time if purchased).

That's enough time to decide if you're serious and in a day and age when everyone has a camera phone there's not really an excuse to not at least photo or cam verify in my mind. It wouldn't be hard to make a cam room solely for verification purposes either.

On the other, (when it comes to legitimate people) I know some people wont want to take any sort of verification pic due to privacy reason, some wont have webcams and getting a meet in a your first month is not exactly a guarantee. On top of that, unverified users probably do generate ad revenue with all the adverts they will see.

As I said, I agree with you in principle but in practice I think it would be better if

Fab implemented a privacy option for verified users that stopped unverified users viewing their profiles all together much like you can block the messages not from non verified users. At least that way, everyone is happy as it becomes a choice rather than a requirement.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Unverified for a year and or not site supporters should be removed. I get that people take their time but it would out the pic collecters???"

Or

You, yourself could just block and ignore those that are unverified and non site supporters for over a year.

You do realise no one should have been meeting this past year

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *oldswarriorMan
over a year ago

Falkirk

People are intitled to operate thier profile however they like.

Fab already has a set of filters in place to allow you to block these types of profiles.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago

East London

You can't dictate how people use the site.

There are tools we can use to help us use the site the best way for us.

You get verified and site supporter pic collectors too.

I stopped using Kik because every person I spoke to on there was only after a wank, and I don't send naked photos to everyone I speak to. If someone won't meet without seeing me naked first then they are not the person for me.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I like to see profiles where people have not even verified their own profile pic , not being able to see my profile. It’s not good enough that the filters only stop them from messaging me.

There is a certain Asian guy from Walsall that I’ve blocked over 30 times. He creates one or even 2 new profiles every week. He’s never verified any of his profiles and he’s free to lurk and stalk our profiles.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *teveanddebsCouple
over a year ago

Norwich


"Unverified for a year and or not site supporters should be removed. I get that people take their time but it would out the pic collecters???"

Really? And how would people have got verified in the last year?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *arsmike111Man
over a year ago

BIGGLESWADE

No one should have been meeting over the last 14 months so would you ban anyone who has. Or just throw out people who have been following the rules.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *eachcplCouple
over a year ago

blackpool/preston/normandy france


"Unverified for a year and or not site supporters should be removed. I get that people take their time but it would out the pic collecters???"

That is a sweeping statement. There should not have been anyone meeting for the last year anyway. As for us we have not been able to get together for that period of time due to travel restrictions and isolation requirements. So by obeying rules you think we should be removed without you knowing anything about us. That is disgraceful. Agree with other posters that you can filter people out if you don't like them but don't tar everyone with the same brush. There are reasons why some people can't or aren't meeting at the moment.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *arsmike111Man
over a year ago

BIGGLESWADE


"Unverified for a year and or not site supporters should be removed. I get that people take their time but it would out the pic collecters???

That is a sweeping statement. There should not have been anyone meeting for the last year anyway. As for us we have not been able to get together for that period of time due to travel restrictions and isolation requirements. So by obeying rules you think we should be removed without you knowing anything about us. That is disgraceful. Agree with other posters that you can filter people out if you don't like them but don't tar everyone with the same brush. There are reasons why some people can't or aren't meeting at the moment. "
well said.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

With covid most people haven't been meeting for over a year ... just block unverified profiles then wouldn't have to think about it

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *awty_MissDynomiteNo1Woman
over a year ago

No idea, I'm lost. Damn Sat nav!

Not everyone chooses to have verifications and I know a few who have asked me not to verify them.

What people choose to do is upto them & no one else has the right to tell others how they should operate their profile.

I dont need verifications to prove I am genuine those who have met me know I am

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

The internet has pics of thousands of people , why would people need to collect pics on here?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *awandBare OP   Woman
over a year ago

Oxford

I am aware of covid and not being able to meet. All the more reason to picture verify but obviously some think that's unacceptable....

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am aware of covid and not being able to meet. All the more reason to picture verify but obviously some think that's unacceptable.... "

I'll tell you I find unacceptable

Belittling others for not fitting what YOU are looking for.

You can just pass them by,ignore them,have no interaction with them.

How they run their profile,wether successfully or not is up to them,not you.

Someone for everyone,not everyone for someone

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *awandBare OP   Woman
over a year ago

Oxford

Not sure how I'm belittling anyone. Almost certain this is posted to the site feedback section as exactly that. Site feedback....

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And I gave feedback to your post

We are allowed to respond,aren't we ?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *awandBare OP   Woman
over a year ago

Oxford

Explain how i belittled anyone then?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Explain how i belittled anyone then? "

Saying they should be removed,as if they have no right to be here

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Ok lets put this to bed. Admin have said PV is not compulsory for all. You can filter out unverified and non SS on your filters page so the site will work for you how you want it to.

https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
back to top