Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Fabswingers.com site feedback |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So looking through couples profiles it's my observation that nearly 95% of the 'couples' pictures are of the female half, with the remainder typically being the blokes dick if they even feature in any photos at all!! Surely I'm not alone in thinking this needs addressing by the site. I'd imagine for single women it must be a little frustrating unless they're totally bi? Would it be possible to implement a mandatory weighting system on couples pictures so that only a maximum of 2/3 of any couples pics could be of any one partner You could achieve this by asking when uploading a picture which partner is in the pic from tick boxes of the partners listed on the account, so either one partner, the other or both, and if one category exceeds the others by more than 2/3 it doesn't allow further pics until there's first more pictures uploaded in the other category. In practice this would mean the 66+ pictures of the female half would need to be supported with 33 pictures of the male/other partner giving balance and reality to a 'couples' account. Make sense? I feel this would give some badly needed equality to couples profiles, after all the idea of a couple's profile is both partners are typically involved, so shouldn't people window shopping be able to see both. " I brought up this concern with a different subject on lounge. Eventhough, I totally agree with you, not sure fab prefers any restrictions on photos as people’s free choice what to share and what not! However, if you want to read other people’s approach on this , feel free. https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/swingers/1006675 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Guess separate albums might be an option so once it tagged Mr, Mrs or Mr&Mrs ... it goes to a certain album. Again this requires a whole set of different programming in their system, not sure if they want to invest on this " I think couples should have to do a verification picture every year. See so many who just seems be male only wanting to meet. Seems suspicious to me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ok well how about a more suggestive approach; for example the tags system where people mark if it's a female/male, if the system detects say after 10 photos that further uploads are all weighted towards one partner, the webpage suggests that next time the couple upload a picture if the other partner category. It might just plant a seed" But what if people want to decide which pics to put up? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is not mandatory to upload any pictures at all. What people chose to show is up to them. If it doesn't meet your search criteria just move on." Being honest, that was our thoughts as well. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Guess separate albums might be an option so once it tagged Mr, Mrs or Mr&Mrs ... it goes to a certain album. Again this requires a whole set of different programming in their system, not sure if they want to invest on this " We would love it if this could be implemented We are definitely guilty of having lots more pics of me than him though too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is not mandatory to upload any pictures at all. What people chose to show is up to them. If it doesn't meet your search criteria just move on." Yep | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So looking through couples profiles it's my observation that nearly 95% of the 'couples' pictures are of the female half, with the remainder typically being the blokes dick if they even feature in any photos at all!! Surely I'm not alone in thinking this needs addressing by the site. I'd imagine for single women it must be a little frustrating unless they're totally bi? Would it be possible to implement a mandatory weighting system on couples pictures so that only a maximum of 2/3 of any couples pics could be of any one partner You could achieve this by asking when uploading a picture which partner is in the pic from tick boxes of the partners listed on the account, so either one partner, the other or both, and if one category exceeds the others by more than 2/3 it doesn't allow further pics until there's first more pictures uploaded in the other category. In practice this would mean the 66+ pictures of the female half would need to be supported with 33 pictures of the male/other partner giving balance and reality to a 'couples' account. Make sense? I feel this would give some badly needed equality to couples profiles, after all the idea of a couple's profile is both partners are typically involved, so shouldn't people window shopping be able to see both. " We always use a selection of pics but I don’t think you can dictate what a couple wish to post. Different horses for different courses. If you don’t like the profile move on to the next one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So looking through couples profiles it's my observation that nearly 95% of the 'couples' pictures are of the female half, with the remainder typically being the blokes dick if they even feature in any photos at all!! Surely I'm not alone in thinking this needs addressing by the site. I'd imagine for single women it must be a little frustrating unless they're totally bi? Would it be possible to implement a mandatory weighting system on couples pictures so that only a maximum of 2/3 of any couples pics could be of any one partner You could achieve this by asking when uploading a picture which partner is in the pic from tick boxes of the partners listed on the account, so either one partner, the other or both, and if one category exceeds the others by more than 2/3 it doesn't allow further pics until there's first more pictures uploaded in the other category. In practice this would mean the 66+ pictures of the female half would need to be supported with 33 pictures of the male/other partner giving balance and reality to a 'couples' account. Make sense? I feel this would give some badly needed equality to couples profiles, after all the idea of a couple's profile is both partners are typically involved, so shouldn't people window shopping be able to see both. " What if the other half isn't likely to be playing? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Doesn’t life have too many rules already. Why do some people feel the need to dictate what other people should do. Majority of our pics are if the wife we have only ever had mfm meets and to be honest I’m sure the guys we’ve met in the passed don’t care what I look like. I’ve got face pics of us both I show when people ask and this has worked well enough for us. " Exactly it’s a free choice of how you wish to operate. Unfortunately pics are all a lot of people want, most never actually read the profile, which for us is every bit as important if we are looking to meet. We have our choice of what type of pics we choose to share with both on our profile but biased towards F. However we always share pics of both if chatting with a meet in mind, key thing is avoiding fakes (pic collectors) and hence we only share with photo verified and meet verified couples or single F. We wouldn’t meet anyone we haven’t confidence in an attraction first so what’s on the profile doesn’t worry us as it’s only an initial lead | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is not mandatory to upload any pictures at all. What people chose to show is up to them. If it doesn't meet your search criteria just move on." I totally agree, it's the same as watching TV - you cannot demand what programmes you want to be displayed. But you can change the channel. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why do some on here feel they have the right to try and dictate what other members do,every member has the right to put on or leave off their profiles the info or pics they choose to,if the info or pics don’t suit you or match what you’re looking for then look elsewhere,plenty of choice for all tastes on here,we only have pics/vids of kas due to only wanting to meet str8 guys:-why on earth should we have to include pics of me?" Exactly this, I thought the point was it’s a place for each individual to express their own kinks in whatever way they choose, If you start putting limits on pics then it would open up putting limits on other things ie the number of single men on the site, There’s loads of single males on here which isn’t what we are looking for but we aren’t complaining lol Happy with the freedom just how it is | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So looking through couples profiles it's my observation that nearly 95% of the 'couples' pictures are of the female half, with the remainder typically being the blokes dick if they even feature in any photos at all!! Surely I'm not alone in thinking this needs addressing by the site. I'd imagine for single women it must be a little frustrating unless they're totally bi? Would it be possible to implement a mandatory weighting system on couples pictures so that only a maximum of 2/3 of any couples pics could be of any one partner You could achieve this by asking when uploading a picture which partner is in the pic from tick boxes of the partners listed on the account, so either one partner, the other or both, and if one category exceeds the others by more than 2/3 it doesn't allow further pics until there's first more pictures uploaded in the other category. In practice this would mean the 66+ pictures of the female half would need to be supported with 33 pictures of the male/other partner giving balance and reality to a 'couples' account. Make sense? I feel this would give some badly needed equality to couples profiles, after all the idea of a couple's profile is both partners are typically involved, so shouldn't people window shopping be able to see both. " Yes I totally agree with you OP.. Its very frustrating.. I've moaned about this a lot especially if they are looking for a FFM.. Just ridiculous really in the scheme of things! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe some of us shouldn't have profiles untill they have been scrutinised and judged to be acceptable by some of you As I and others have said,if a profile isn't to your liking look for another that is Fab isn't all about you" Lol well said As if people just rely on the pics displayed on profile. We experienced that being an Asian, very few people would be interested in us anyway as preferences takes precedence over pics and profile description. So we just post my pics for our own enjoyment. If anyone wants to play with us will sure message us for hubby's pics , which we readily oblige. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So looking through couples profiles it's my observation that nearly 95% of the 'couples' pictures are of the female half, with the remainder typically being the blokes dick if they even feature in any photos at all!! Surely I'm not alone in thinking this needs addressing by the site. I'd imagine for single women it must be a little frustrating unless they're totally bi? Would it be possible to implement a mandatory weighting system on couples pictures so that only a maximum of 2/3 of any couples pics could be of any one partner You could achieve this by asking when uploading a picture which partner is in the pic from tick boxes of the partners listed on the account, so either one partner, the other or both, and if one category exceeds the others by more than 2/3 it doesn't allow further pics until there's first more pictures uploaded in the other category. In practice this would mean the 66+ pictures of the female half would need to be supported with 33 pictures of the male/other partner giving balance and reality to a 'couples' account. Make sense? I feel this would give some badly needed equality to couples profiles, after all the idea of a couple's profile is both partners are typically involved, so shouldn't people window shopping be able to see both. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We only meet at clubs so no need for any photos really We post them for fun If making things mandatory why not include if singles are married or have a partner that don't know there on here " Exactly the list is endless, We don’t particularly want to look at people upside down with a candle up their arse but if that’s there thing so be it, We just move passed the people we don’t like and know there will be others that will like that kind of stuff, It’s not hurting us so we don’t say anything, | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We don’t particularly want to look at people upside down with a candle up their arse but if that’s there thing so be it" Stay classy... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We don’t particularly want to look at people upside down with a candle up their arse but if that’s there thing so be it Stay classy..." It’s not about being classy, it’s about understanding everyone’s different, We like lingerie and maybe you don’t, Sure you would agree there’s a tiny percentage of people that you would be interested in on here and that’s the same for the majority, doesn’t mean we can tell the larger percentage what we think they should have on their profile. It’s a swingers site full of interesting and different people so if you don’t like what you see then move on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |