Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Club/Event ads |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love seeing one of these advertised " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love seeing one of these advertised " Not for the reason you may think though | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I love seeing one of these advertised Not for the reason you may think though " Ditto! Great 'research material'. I'd rather know who's not playing safe and this is a good source of data. Each to their own (and interesting that both women involved have Safe Sex in their interests - and one SAFE SEX ONLY in big capitals in the profile text!) - but I'm sure many Fab members will be grateful of the heads up!! A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"nice to see the anti each to their own brigade responding so quickly. Shame The Environmental Agency and The Rivers Agency haven't been so quick to react lately. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"nice to see the anti each to their own brigade responding so quickly. Shame The Environmental Agency and The Rivers Agency haven't been so quick to react lately. " I think if you check I used exactly the words 'each to their own' in my post - hardly anti. However I reserve the right to both comment - and to do what I can to keep myself safe by using threads like this to identify those that choose to put themselves at increased risk. It's personal choice whether to play safe or not. I choose to do so. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"nice to see the anti each to their own brigade responding so quickly. Shame The Environmental Agency and The Rivers Agency haven't been so quick to react lately. I think if you check I used exactly the words 'each to their own' in my post - hardly anti. However I reserve the right to both comment - and to do what I can to keep myself safe by using threads like this to identify those that choose to put themselves at increased risk. It's personal choice whether to play safe or not. I choose to do so. A" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only flaw in your otherwise foolproof research plan is that you have announced publicly what you are doing and possibly prevented the very people you wish to observe from posting...... .....You know the bit in James Bond films where the villian explains to Bond the master plan just before failing to kill him by something extravagant like sharks etc, yep thought you did." Not really! There's all sorts of ways of doing 'research'! Veri's, posts on forums, profile content, club reviews, status updates - the list is quite long!! So the lack of posts on here won't make any difference. No plan is foolproof - ask any Bond villain! But a bit of detective work never did Holmes, Jim Bergerac (even after he moved to Midsomer) or Kojak any harm! A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |