Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Club Discussion |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just seen this in the local paper http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/stanwell-spa-defeated-latest-sex-11683204" Is this for real? I do hope not! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub " This is true, outside of the bubble of fab the general public does not like swingers and there are people looking for any excuse to close down a swingers club. On the other hand the council are very bigoted and never would have given permission in the first place so better to have done what they did than it never having existed at all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub " I have to agree - I've never been but I know it is a very popular venue. BUT! If they haven't followed proper planning regulations as they expanded then they can have no complaints I think. We might all be up in arms as it's a popular swinging venue, but that doesn't make them exempt from the rules that everyone else has to adhere to. I hope that the venture can either secure the necessary permits or relocate nearby with appropriate authority as it will be a shame to see this facility lost for good | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub I have to agree - I've never been but I know it is a very popular venue. BUT! If they haven't followed proper planning regulations as they expanded then they can have no complaints I think. We might all be up in arms as it's a popular swinging venue, but that doesn't make them exempt from the rules that everyone else has to adhere to. I hope that the venture can either secure the necessary permits or relocate nearby with appropriate authority as it will be a shame to see this facility lost for good " You assume everyone gets equal treatment if they try and follow the rules. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I googled it and the dates don't seem to match, 29 apr 2015? Or have it taken a year to get to the decision?" The main post is dated today. You have clicked on the links for previous reports. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub This is true, outside of the bubble of fab the general public does not like swingers and there are people looking for any excuse to close down a swingers club. On the other hand the council are very bigoted and never would have given permission in the first place so better to have done what they did than it never having existed at all. " I (Maria) have never been to any clubs but cannot understand any council's thinking behind closing down places but I don't know why they are being closed down in this case. Where I live, its all residential apart from the usual corner shops and a few shops along the main road, since I was quite young among these shops have been two sex shops, for at least 40 years, children have to walk past these shops to go to school or get home or to the local park, there has never been any trouble to my knowledge but why they were allowed to be there is beyond me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub This is true, outside of the bubble of fab the general public does not like swingers and there are people looking for any excuse to close down a swingers club. On the other hand the council are very bigoted and never would have given permission in the first place so better to have done what they did than it never having existed at all. I (Maria) have never been to any clubs but cannot understand any council's thinking behind closing down places " Really? You don't think that some people consider some forms of business to be undesirable? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was no intention from the club re breaching planning, sadly one of the owners had passed away and Graham another owner has been quoted in the article if people read it! The club does bring badly needed revenue to the local shops, provides employment and yes the road is residential but up the other end, the kestrels end is mainly commercial. Best thing to do is keep going and swell the coffers, that's what we'll do. " But at the end of the day he is now the owner and if he did not re apply for planning permission the club has not got a leg to stand on I agree that the club is not in a residential area at all, one side is Heathrow and the main road but councils will find any excuse to close such locations down I personally think it should stay open but again rules are rules | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was no intention from the club re breaching planning, sadly one of the owners had passed away and Graham another owner has been quoted in the article if people read it! The club does bring badly needed revenue to the local shops, provides employment and yes the road is residential but up the other end, the kestrels end is mainly commercial. Best thing to do is keep going and swell the coffers, that's what we'll do. But at the end of the day he is now the owner and if he did not re apply for planning permission the club has not got a leg to stand on I agree that the club is not in a residential area at all, one side is Heathrow and the main road but councils will find any excuse to close such locations down I personally think it should stay open but again rules are rules " Fuck 'em, and their law | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just a thought, if they expand Heathrow towards the M25, won't that whole village dissappear anyway? " No they want to build north not west. Sipson will go not Stanwell | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub This is true, outside of the bubble of fab the general public does not like swingers and there are people looking for any excuse to close down a swingers club. On the other hand the council are very bigoted and never would have given permission in the first place so better to have done what they did than it never having existed at all. I (Maria) have never been to any clubs but cannot understand any council's thinking behind closing down places Really? You don't think that some people consider some forms of business to be undesirable? " off-licences, pubs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just a thought, if they expand Heathrow towards the M25, won't that whole village dissappear anyway? No they want to build north not west. Sipson will go not Stanwell " Thought the plan evolved expanding over the M25 and making that whole stretch to the west of the airport a tunnel? Surely that'd take out Stanwell Moor too? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still they could always take it to the European Court of human... oh yeah oops. " Are you all telling me that everyone here voted IN just so we could keep Kestrels open? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still they could always take it to the European Court of human... oh yeah oops. Are you all telling me that everyone here voted IN just so we could keep Kestrels open?" I made the mistake of reading the actual ruling from the High Court case. The detail made my eyes glaze but l came away with the view Kestrels did not have a leg to stand on in law. However it was clear that the change of use was actually the weakest point given the right to use for hydro pods therapy. The Council was relying on the changes made to the site were inappropriate for the green belt and should be removed and the site returned to residential use. Given that Heathrow is just down the road and may be expanded into the greenbelt and that there is industry within a couple of hundred yards of Kestrels, the protest that the case was nothing to do with it being used for swinging seemed hollow and just made the case seem vindictive. However l am not a lawyer and may have misread the case. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still they could always take it to the European Court of human... oh yeah oops. Are you all telling me that everyone here voted IN just so we could keep Kestrels open?" I made the mistake of reading the actual ruling from the High Court case. The detail made my eyes glaze but l came away with the view Kestrels did not have a leg to stand on in law. However it was clear that the change of use was actually the weakest point given the right to use for hydro pods therapy. The Council was relying on the changes made to the site were inappropriate for the green belt and should be removed and the site returned to residential use. Given that Heathrow is just down the road and may be expanded into the greenbelt and that there is industry within a couple of hundred yards of Kestrels, the protest that the case was nothing to do with it being used for swinging seemed hollow and just made the case seem vindictive. However l am not a lawyer and may have misread the case. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still they could always take it to the European Court of human... oh yeah oops. Are you all telling me that everyone here voted IN just so we could keep Kestrels open? I made the mistake of reading the actual ruling from the High Court case. The detail made my eyes glaze but l came away with the view Kestrels did not have a leg to stand on in law. However it was clear that the change of use was actually the weakest point given the right to use for hydro pods therapy. The Council was relying on the changes made to the site were inappropriate for the green belt and should be removed and the site returned to residential use. Given that Heathrow is just down the road and may be expanded into the greenbelt and that there is industry within a couple of hundred yards of Kestrels, the protest that the case was nothing to do with it being used for swinging seemed hollow and just made the case seem vindictive. However l am not a lawyer and may have misread the case." You could have just read the newspaper reports where the council are quoted as saying they are determined to shut it down because of what it is. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hope it doesn't close as I'm a regular visitor and have made a lot of friends there. I'll be gutted as its the closest club to me fingers crossed kestrels / ab Fabs can continue to fight and ne successful xx" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still they could always take it to the European Court of human... oh yeah oops. Are you all telling me that everyone here voted IN just so we could keep Kestrels open? I made the mistake of reading the actual ruling from the High Court case. The detail made my eyes glaze but l came away with the view Kestrels did not have a leg to stand on in law. However it was clear that the change of use was actually the weakest point given the right to use for hydro pods therapy. The Council was relying on the changes made to the site were inappropriate for the green belt and should be removed and the site returned to residential use. Given that Heathrow is just down the road and may be expanded into the greenbelt and that there is industry within a couple of hundred yards of Kestrels, the protest that the case was nothing to do with it being used for swinging seemed hollow and just made the case seem vindictive. However l am not a lawyer and may have misread the case. You could have just read the newspaper reports where the council are quoted as saying they are determined to shut it down because of what it is. " Relying on newspapers to be accurate is like relying on the withdrawal system to prevent pregnancy. It was good bed time reading and quicker than counting sheep. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was no intention from the club re breaching planning, sadly one of the owners had passed away and Graham another owner has been quoted in the article if people read it! The club does bring badly needed revenue to the local shops, provides employment and yes the road is residential but up the other end, the kestrels end is mainly commercial. Best thing to do is keep going and swell the coffers, that's what we'll do. But at the end of the day he is now the owner and if he did not re apply for planning permission the club has not got a leg to stand on I agree that the club is not in a residential area at all, one side is Heathrow and the main road but councils will find any excuse to close such locations down I personally think it should stay open but again rules are rules Fuck 'em, and their law" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was no intention from the club re breaching planning, sadly one of the owners had passed away and Graham another owner has been quoted in the article if people read it! The club does bring badly needed revenue to the local shops, provides employment and yes the road is residential but up the other end, the kestrels end is mainly commercial. Best thing to do is keep going and swell the coffers, that's what we'll do. But at the end of the day he is now the owner and if he did not re apply for planning permission the club has not got a leg to stand on I agree that the club is not in a residential area at all, one side is Heathrow and the main road but councils will find any excuse to close such locations down I personally think it should stay open but again rules are rules " There is hope the club continues in whatever form and the council seemed to have jump when Graham and the team had other things on their mind such as the loss of their friend, the other owner. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was no intention from the club re breaching planning, sadly one of the owners had passed away and Graham another owner has been quoted in the article if people read it! The club does bring badly needed revenue to the local shops, provides employment and yes the road is residential but up the other end, the kestrels end is mainly commercial. Best thing to do is keep going and swell the coffers, that's what we'll do. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There was no intention from the club re breaching planning, sadly one of the owners had passed away and Graham another owner has been quoted in the article if people read it! The club does bring badly needed revenue to the local shops, provides employment and yes the road is residential but up the other end, the kestrels end is mainly commercial. Best thing to do is keep going and swell the coffers, that's what we'll do. " From what I seen printed at other times, the site was more akin to a scrap yard before it became what it is now! I`ve also seen somewhere that the council want it returned to industrial use! Don`t quote me though as I may be wrong! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still they could always take it to the European Court of human... oh yeah oops. Are you all telling me that everyone here voted IN just so we could keep Kestrels open? I made the mistake of reading the actual ruling from the High Court case. The detail made my eyes glaze but l came away with the view Kestrels did not have a leg to stand on in law. However it was clear that the change of use was actually the weakest point given the right to use for hydro pods therapy. The Council was relying on the changes made to the site were inappropriate for the green belt and should be removed and the site returned to residential use. Given that Heathrow is just down the road and may be expanded into the greenbelt and that there is industry within a couple of hundred yards of Kestrels, the protest that the case was nothing to do with it being used for swinging seemed hollow and just made the case seem vindictive. However l am not a lawyer and may have misread the case. You could have just read the newspaper reports where the council are quoted as saying they are determined to shut it down because of what it is. Relying on newspapers to be accurate is like relying on the withdrawal system to prevent pregnancy. It was good bed time reading and quicker than counting sheep. " The problem with newspapers is generally their poor analysis of situations. They don't tend to quote verbatim things that weren't said, even if they may exclude context at times. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's just a bit silly that actual nightclubs which have been associated with serious assault and even death remain open, but a private adult venue such as Kestrels remains the biggest part of their concern. Priorities mixed up much? " While I agree, society in general does not. In my teenage years one of my friends got involved in hard drugs and group sex. When it was discovered, her family and friends were more upset, worried and outraged about the group sex than the hard drugs! I could not understand that then and do not now...but the view is not entirelt atypical. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It's just a bit silly that actual nightclubs which have been associated with serious assault and even death remain open, but a private adult venue such as Kestrels remains the biggest part of their concern. Priorities mixed up much? While I agree, society in general does not. In my teenage years one of my friends got involved in hard drugs and group sex. When it was discovered, her family and friends were more upset, worried and outraged about the group sex than the hard drugs! I could not understand that then and do not now...but the view is not entirelt atypical." Apparently we develop most of our attitudes about sex, before we have it (i.e before the age of 12) based on social clues handed down to us by out parents about good, clean, proper behaviour. So if people are irrationally stupid about sex then you can literally blame their parents. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub I have to agree - I've never been but I know it is a very popular venue. BUT! If they haven't followed proper planning regulations as they expanded then they can have no complaints I think. We might all be up in arms as it's a popular swinging venue, but that doesn't make them exempt from the rules that everyone else has to adhere to. I hope that the venture can either secure the necessary permits or relocate nearby with appropriate authority as it will be a shame to see this facility lost for good " Maybe they need to employ the services of a planning consultant ah em!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still they could always take it to the European Court of human... oh yeah oops. Are you all telling me that everyone here voted IN just so we could keep Kestrels open?" Good God man can you not tell a tongue in cheek comment. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Still they could always take it to the European Court of human... oh yeah oops. Are you all telling me that everyone here voted IN just so we could keep Kestrels open? Good God man can you not tell a tongue in cheek comment. " Yeah, sorry, I forgot to put a "lol" on the end of my last statement. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Does anyone actually know if there is a confirmed closing date yet? Can't seem to find any information other than newspaper reports. " I don't think there's a date yet. The owners say they intend to appeal to the next level up in the court system, the closure won't be enforced while the appeal process is ongoing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub This is true, outside of the bubble of fab the general public does not like swingers and there are people looking for any excuse to close down a swingers club. On the other hand the council are very bigoted and never would have given permission in the first place so better to have done what they did than it never having existed at all. I (Maria) have never been to any clubs but cannot understand any council's thinking behind closing down places Really? You don't think that some people consider some forms of business to be undesirable? " Sounds like you consider it undesirable. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well we supporting the cause and going today...... just to show support and all that..... honest! " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well we supporting the cause and going today...... just to show support and all that..... honest! " great pic's. Nipples like my Jools. Very suckable. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please guys this club may have lost its appeal but it is not the end of the road yet !!!!! Business still as usual and there will be the next stage of appeal .... come on guys this clubs need you nod any help it can get SUPPORT X" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well we supporting the cause and going today...... just to show support and all that..... honest! great pic's. Nipples like my Jools. Very suckable. " Oh yes they are!!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Whilst I like Abfabs and Kestrals - if they did not adhere to planning permission then unfortunately they can't complain - if it does go which will be a shame - tbh the club and are around it is not in a hugely residential area compared to other clubs and it does brings a lot of business to local pub This is true, outside of the bubble of fab the general public does not like swingers and there are people looking for any excuse to close down a swingers club. On the other hand the council are very bigoted and never would have given permission in the first place so better to have done what they did than it never having existed at all. I (Maria) have never been to any clubs but cannot understand any council's thinking behind closing down places Really? You don't think that some people consider some forms of business to be undesirable? Sounds like you consider it undesirable. " What a stupid thing to say, we go there a lot. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I googled it and the dates don't seem to match, 29 apr 2015? Or have it taken a year to get to the decision? The main post is dated today. You have clicked on the links for previous reports." I see and that is right, so if they wouldn't have wanted that dungeon, would it all be fine? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |