Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Club Discussion |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It seems that most days there's at least one story about some big company getting hacked despite employing a bunch of people specifically to stop that happening. So what chance has a swingers club with just a few staff got? And some clubs are moving to online registration which is even riskier. So sooner or later it's going to happen. What will you do when your name and address is published as a member of your local swingers club?" Not a lot.... I don't think anyone will be that bothered.. and all would have my old address anyway lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I doubt anyone would bother trying to hack a clubs system. There's no financial gain to be had. " Well some people might prefer to pay up, rather than being exposed. And people don't just hack for financial gain - often just for the challenge and publicity. Hack a swingers club and you'd get a LOT of publicity. I don't think the move to online registration for clubs is very responsible. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I doubt anyone would bother trying to hack a clubs system. There's no financial gain to be had. Well some people might prefer to pay up, rather than being exposed. And people don't just hack for financial gain - often just for the challenge and publicity. Hack a swingers club and you'd get a LOT of publicity. I don't think the move to online registration for clubs is very responsible." why... they are bound by the same data protection other places have. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To be honest, the low level of IT used by most clubs would shield them from being hacked. " I'd totally agree with you on that. But some clubs seem to be trying to do more online, and I can't help feeling that that will all end in tears. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people don't realise most of their information and intrests/activities are avaliable on the dark Web already (or with a little connecting the dots from the data). It's incredibly hard to stay private it's more a case of roulette (with favorable odds) that the spotlight is not turned on you. Not saying don't look after yourself and make it easy. Just most people are far more compromised than they know. So remember to ballance security with having a great time. Life is too short and chances are your compromised already. Also I guess that is an advantage to clubs like the Attic, Derby. No membership, no details. Just pay entry on the door and stay anonymous." It does make me nervous when clubs don't take ID or have membership. Keeping things anonymous make suit those that are paranoid about hacking, are cheating on partners or who don't want a record of them being on the premises. But clubs need council licences to operate. Part of that is recording who is in the building for health and safety reasons and in case attendees need to be contacted in case of an unwanted and unexpected 'occurrence'. There have been numerous incidents of assaults at clubs over the years. Imagine how hard it is to track an offender if you've no idea who was in the building? Imagine if there was a fire? No records means no idea who's there, how many or if anyone was missing? Surely safety overrides any privacy concerns? Or do people honestly just not care? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people don't realise most of their information and intrests/activities are avaliable on the dark Web already (or with a little connecting the dots from the data). It's incredibly hard to stay private it's more a case of roulette (with favorable odds) that the spotlight is not turned on you. Not saying don't look after yourself and make it easy. Just most people are far more compromised than they know. So remember to ballance security with having a great time. Life is too short and chances are your compromised already. Also I guess that is an advantage to clubs like the Attic, Derby. No membership, no details. Just pay entry on the door and stay anonymous. It does make me nervous when clubs don't take ID or have membership. Keeping things anonymous make suit those that are paranoid about hacking, are cheating on partners or who don't want a record of them being on the premises. But clubs need council licences to operate. Part of that is recording who is in the building for health and safety reasons and in case attendees need to be contacted in case of an unwanted and unexpected 'occurrence'. There have been numerous incidents of assaults at clubs over the years. Imagine how hard it is to track an offender if you've no idea who was in the building? Imagine if there was a fire? No records means no idea who's there, how many or if anyone was missing? Surely safety overrides any privacy concerns? Or do people honestly just not care? " Well like the rest of this lifestyle everything is a risk assessment and personal choice over how you chose to done things. It doesn't bother really either way. As I've said I don't thinks there's a lot of added risk to a responsible club holding your data over what is already available through dubious sources. Personally myself and My Girl are members of a fair few clubs. However we are happy to go to well respected non-membership clubs understanding the concerns about people not having to give details as you've pointed out. We trust the judgement of the staff and not seen extra problems than that of a members club. Membership doesn't always seem a particular barrier to unpleasant behaviour. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people don't realise most of their information and intrests/activities are avaliable on the dark Web already (or with a little connecting the dots from the data). It's incredibly hard to stay private it's more a case of roulette (with favorable odds) that the spotlight is not turned on you. Not saying don't look after yourself and make it easy. Just most people are far more compromised than they know. So remember to ballance security with having a great time. Life is too short and chances are your compromised already. Also I guess that is an advantage to clubs like the Attic, Derby. No membership, no details. Just pay entry on the door and stay anonymous. It does make me nervous when clubs don't take ID or have membership. Keeping things anonymous make suit those that are paranoid about hacking, are cheating on partners or who don't want a record of them being on the premises. But clubs need council licences to operate. Part of that is recording who is in the building for health and safety reasons and in case attendees need to be contacted in case of an unwanted and unexpected 'occurrence'. There have been numerous incidents of assaults at clubs over the years. Imagine how hard it is to track an offender if you've no idea who was in the building? Imagine if there was a fire? No records means no idea who's there, how many or if anyone was missing? Surely safety overrides any privacy concerns? Or do people honestly just not care? " Well said .. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There’s probably more chance of hackers targeting swinging sites like this than there is clubs, yet we’ve all happily joined up" You don't provide personal details like an address and ID etc to join here | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people don't realise most of their information and intrests/activities are avaliable on the dark Web already (or with a little connecting the dots from the data). It's incredibly hard to stay private it's more a case of roulette (with favorable odds) that the spotlight is not turned on you. Not saying don't look after yourself and make it easy. Just most people are far more compromised than they know. So remember to ballance security with having a great time. Life is too short and chances are your compromised already. Also I guess that is an advantage to clubs like the Attic, Derby. No membership, no details. Just pay entry on the door and stay anonymous. It does make me nervous when clubs don't take ID or have membership. Keeping things anonymous make suit those that are paranoid about hacking, are cheating on partners or who don't want a record of them being on the premises. But clubs need council licences to operate. Part of that is recording who is in the building for health and safety reasons and in case attendees need to be contacted in case of an unwanted and unexpected 'occurrence'. There have been numerous incidents of assaults at clubs over the years. Imagine how hard it is to track an offender if you've no idea who was in the building? Imagine if there was a fire? No records means no idea who's there, how many or if anyone was missing? Surely safety overrides any privacy concerns? Or do people honestly just not care? " What about the many thousands of pubs and vanilla night club's that don't require ID? They have incidents and assaults all the time, a nightclub near us had a serious fire and people died. Should they require ID? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people don't realise most of their information and intrests/activities are avaliable on the dark Web already (or with a little connecting the dots from the data). It's incredibly hard to stay private it's more a case of roulette (with favorable odds) that the spotlight is not turned on you. Not saying don't look after yourself and make it easy. Just most people are far more compromised than they know. So remember to ballance security with having a great time. Life is too short and chances are your compromised already. Also I guess that is an advantage to clubs like the Attic, Derby. No membership, no details. Just pay entry on the door and stay anonymous. It does make me nervous when clubs don't take ID or have membership. Keeping things anonymous make suit those that are paranoid about hacking, are cheating on partners or who don't want a record of them being on the premises. But clubs need council licences to operate. Part of that is recording who is in the building for health and safety reasons and in case attendees need to be contacted in case of an unwanted and unexpected 'occurrence'. There have been numerous incidents of assaults at clubs over the years. Imagine how hard it is to track an offender if you've no idea who was in the building? Imagine if there was a fire? No records means no idea who's there, how many or if anyone was missing? Surely safety overrides any privacy concerns? Or do people honestly just not care? What about the many thousands of pubs and vanilla night club's that don't require ID? They have incidents and assaults all the time, a nightclub near us had a serious fire and people died. Should they require ID?" Most swingers clubs are private member clubs and their licensing council requires membership. Personally I prefer a well run club which knows who’s attending. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is the reason we've stopped going as the local clubs we used to go to started getting anal about wanting to record our details on their database. No thanks! " But you’re on fab ……. 😂😂😂😂😂 | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A lot of people don't realise most of their information and intrests/activities are avaliable on the dark Web already (or with a little connecting the dots from the data). It's incredibly hard to stay private it's more a case of roulette (with favorable odds) that the spotlight is not turned on you. Not saying don't look after yourself and make it easy. Just most people are far more compromised than they know. So remember to ballance security with having a great time. Life is too short and chances are your compromised already. Also I guess that is an advantage to clubs like the Attic, Derby. No membership, no details. Just pay entry on the door and stay anonymous. It does make me nervous when clubs don't take ID or have membership. Keeping things anonymous make suit those that are paranoid about hacking, are cheating on partners or who don't want a record of them being on the premises. But clubs need council licences to operate. Part of that is recording who is in the building for health and safety reasons and in case attendees need to be contacted in case of an unwanted and unexpected 'occurrence'. There have been numerous incidents of assaults at clubs over the years. Imagine how hard it is to track an offender if you've no idea who was in the building? Imagine if there was a fire? No records means no idea who's there, how many or if anyone was missing? Surely safety overrides any privacy concerns? Or do people honestly just not care? What about the many thousands of pubs and vanilla night club's that don't require ID? They have incidents and assaults all the time, a nightclub near us had a serious fire and people died. Should they require ID? Most swingers clubs are private member clubs and their licensing council requires membership. Personally I prefer a well run club which knows who’s attending. " Same for us | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is the reason we've stopped going as the local clubs we used to go to started getting anal about wanting to record our details on their database. No thanks! But you’re on fab ……. 😂😂😂😂😂" To be fair, FAB don't ask for ANY personal data whatsoever. You don't even need to give them your real name or date-of-birth. There's no ID or address requested at ANY point. Personally, I am more than happy to give clubs my details, and have no concerns about my details being targeted. Cal | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"To be honest, the low level of IT used by most clubs would shield them from being hacked. I'd totally agree with you on that. But some clubs seem to be trying to do more online, and I can't help feeling that that will all end in tears. " Unless you don't do other things online, it isn't going to make any difference! If you shop online or use any popular social media, your details are out there already. If you're worried about people thinking you're a swinger, a club being hacked should be less worrying than having a Fab profile with pics or entering a club or meeting in public. 🤷♂️ | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" What about the many thousands of pubs and vanilla night club's that don't require ID? They have incidents and assaults all the time, a nightclub near us had a serious fire and people died. Should they require ID?" Most pubs, bars and nightclubs have internal CCTV which helps in terms of the potential for assaults and unwanted behaviour. Swinging clubs don't. There's also no private, sometimes lockable rooms in pubs/vanilla nightclubs, nor people indulging in nakedness and casual sex with strangers. The two aren't directly comparable from a safety aspect, although in the event of a fire I'm sure emergency services would be grateful for a list of who's in the building. A doorman with a head count clicker is unlikely to be accurate. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" What about the many thousands of pubs and vanilla night club's that don't require ID? They have incidents and assaults all the time, a nightclub near us had a serious fire and people died. Should they require ID? Most pubs, bars and nightclubs have internal CCTV which helps in terms of the potential for assaults and unwanted behaviour. Swinging clubs don't. There's also no private, sometimes lockable rooms in pubs/vanilla nightclubs, nor people indulging in nakedness and casual sex with strangers. The two aren't directly comparable from a safety aspect, although in the event of a fire I'm sure emergency services would be grateful for a list of who's in the building. A doorman with a head count clicker is unlikely to be accurate. " Every club I've been to has had CCTV in all of the social areas & corridors. Pubs & night clubs also still have areas without camera coverage, especially toilets. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |