Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Swinging Club Discussion |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I'm looking for some feedback please. Last month, me and a good friend of mine, tried going down to a club. We were told by the woman who runs it we were OK to get in, but to come in separately. Now, on the night in question my friend (who has a medical condition that affects his speech and balance, not massively, but noticable) got denied entry as he was talking to a group of lads outside and the woman who runs it (trying not to name names here) said he was d*unk and was part of the group. I explained his condition and that he was with me, not them. That we had discussed it earlier that day. She wouldn't budge. We left is as bad luck and left on good terms with her saying he/we were welcome to come back any other night. We did. We tried again last week, after confirming it was him that was coming with me again, we were again told entry wouldn't be an issue and set off on the 3hr round trip, only for her to say he was d*unk again. Again, I explained I don't touch alcohol anymore and he's not had a drink this year due to his medical conditions. He was banned for life on the basis "she doesn't get a good vibe from him" but I was welcome to leave him outside and come in. An offer I declined on both occasions. I posted a review, obviously negative, after the event. I've subsequently been blocked and (I assume) banned. My friend in question is an outstanding bloke, honest, hilarious, life and soul of the party, not a bad bone in his body. She just took a dislike on, what seems to me, his medical condition... discrimination? " very much so | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"It definitely sounds like discrimination from the club owner to me. Maybe she'd had issues with single men recently and was being extra cautious to ensure others in the club weren't put off attending, but it's awful to have explained your friends medical status and him being rejected because of a "bad vibe". Very unfair. At least you know not to bother going there again and I hope you find another club that welcomes you both. " Thankyou lizzy | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That is understandable on your first visit. We have a freind we meet in a pub. His speech was slurred and his walk and ballence was all over the place. We assumed he was steaming. Until he walked to the toilet and his girlfriend explained he was like this due to an accident. Seemed steaming to us and we did wonder why the bar served him. But we now know he's a regular and the staff know him and his condition. He is a drinker like us but the people who know him can tell when he's d*unk and when he's not. So I understand the clubs error and although genuine in your case clubs, pubs and bouncers hear all sorts of tales from less d*unk mates why their steaming mate should get in. And a lot of people don't have awareness of these conditions. So when you run a business where excessively d*unk people may be dangerous (a swinging club being a prime example) and may result in you losing permission to run your business you can understand where the owners thinking is. However it seems sad that the owners has down the line adopted this line when you have gone to great efforts to explain the situation and clear things up. Frustrating as it must be I don't blame the owners on the first night. But with the following correspondence they seem not to want to clear the matter up which does come across discriminatory. " I agree entirely, the first occasion we both just brushed off. The second one really affected his confidence though. Thankfully we've been invited to a different club this weekend. Alls well, that ends well | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"That is understandable on your first visit. We have a freind we meet in a pub. His speech was slurred and his walk and ballence was all over the place. We assumed he was steaming. Until he walked to the toilet and his girlfriend explained he was like this due to an accident. Seemed steaming to us and we did wonder why the bar served him. But we now know he's a regular and the staff know him and his condition. He is a drinker like us but the people who know him can tell when he's d*unk and when he's not. So I understand the clubs error and although genuine in your case clubs, pubs and bouncers hear all sorts of tales from less d*unk mates why their steaming mate should get in. And a lot of people don't have awareness of these conditions. So when you run a business where excessively d*unk people may be dangerous (a swinging club being a prime example) and may result in you losing permission to run your business you can understand where the owners thinking is. However it seems sad that the owners has down the line adopted this line when you have gone to great efforts to explain the situation and clear things up. Frustrating as it must be I don't blame the owners on the first night. But with the following correspondence they seem not to want to clear the matter up which does come across discriminatory. I agree entirely, the first occasion we both just brushed off. The second one really affected his confidence though. Thankfully we've been invited to a different club this weekend. Alls well, that ends well " I can imagine how that effects your confidence. Even when you are aware of the natural reaction your condition gets its a kick in the teeth. Especially when a place doesn't seem to want to give you the time of day. Hopefully you both have a great time at the club especially. It has a difference knowing your welcome and the club understands. I would say their is a clear advantage to a place that hopefully with get to know you and your freind well. And of course its that clubs gain over the other clubs loss, especially seeing how highly you talk of your freind. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I'm looking for some feedback please. Last month, me and a good friend of mine, tried going down to a club. We were told by the woman who runs it we were OK to get in, but to come in separately. Now, on the night in question my friend (who has a medical condition that affects his speech and balance, not massively, but noticable) got denied entry as he was talking to a group of lads outside and the woman who runs it (trying not to name names here) said he was d*unk and was part of the group. I explained his condition and that he was with me, not them. That we had discussed it earlier that day. She wouldn't budge. We left is as bad luck and left on good terms with her saying he/we were welcome to come back any other night. Absolutely discrimination - but I wonder if the ban can be uplifted (not that you might want to go after) if he got a letter from his doctor that he could keep as evidence of his medical condition and how it makes him seen to others. I’d imagine in his home area locals know him, (pub landlords etc) and don’t have an issue letting him in. But to people who run a business where it says in the rules that you cannot be intoxicated upon entry, is difficult to know the difference, and some people just point blank refuse to believe it. We did. We tried again last week, after confirming it was him that was coming with me again, we were again told entry wouldn't be an issue and set off on the 3hr round trip, only for her to say he was d*unk again. Again, I explained I don't touch alcohol anymore and he's not had a drink this year due to his medical conditions. He was banned for life on the basis "she doesn't get a good vibe from him" but I was welcome to leave him outside and come in. An offer I declined on both occasions. I posted a review, obviously negative, after the event. I've subsequently been blocked and (I assume) banned. My friend in question is an outstanding bloke, honest, hilarious, life and soul of the party, not a bad bone in his body. She just took a dislike on, what seems to me, his medical condition... discrimination? " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Worked out which club it is and I definitely will be avoiding. It was actually a club I intended to attend as they do fetish nights but there are other suitable clubs. " Some clubs, like f and quest, advertise their fetish events on a different site. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I'm looking for some feedback please. Last month, me and a good friend of mine, tried going down to a club. We were told by the woman who runs it we were OK to get in, but to come in separately. Now, on the night in question my friend (who has a medical condition that affects his speech and balance, not massively, but noticable) got denied entry as he was talking to a group of lads outside and the woman who runs it (trying not to name names here) said he was d*unk and was part of the group. I explained his condition and that he was with me, not them. That we had discussed it earlier that day. She wouldn't budge. We left is as bad luck and left on good terms with her saying he/we were welcome to come back any other night. We did. We tried again last week, after confirming it was him that was coming with me again, we were again told entry wouldn't be an issue and set off on the 3hr round trip, only for her to say he was d*unk again. Again, I explained I don't touch alcohol anymore and he's not had a drink this year due to his medical conditions. He was banned for life on the basis "she doesn't get a good vibe from him" but I was welcome to leave him outside and come in. An offer I declined on both occasions. I posted a review, obviously negative, after the event. I've subsequently been blocked and (I assume) banned. My friend in question is an outstanding bloke, honest, hilarious, life and soul of the party, not a bad bone in his body. She just took a dislike on, what seems to me, his medical condition... discrimination? " Absolutely discrimination - but I wonder if the ban can be uplifted (not that you might want to go after) if he got a letter from his doctor that he could keep as evidence of his medical condition and how it makes him seen to others. I’d imagine in his home area locals know him, (pub landlords etc) and don’t have an issue letting him in. But to people who run a business where it says in the rules that you cannot be intoxicated upon entry, is difficult to know the difference, and some people just point blank refuse to believe it. Reposted as I seem to have lost the ability to do this right the first time | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Sounds really horrible sorry but I'd have to name them call them out definitely sounds discriminating " I plano emailing the management to see what they say, before mentioning any names. Sshhh, for now | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I'm looking for some feedback please. Last month, me and a good friend of mine, tried going down to a club. We were told by the woman who runs it we were OK to get in, but to come in separately. Now, on the night in question my friend (who has a medical condition that affects his speech and balance, not massively, but noticable) got denied entry as he was talking to a group of lads outside and the woman who runs it (trying not to name names here) said he was d*unk and was part of the group. I explained his condition and that he was with me, not them. That we had discussed it earlier that day. She wouldn't budge. We left is as bad luck and left on good terms with her saying he/we were welcome to come back any other night. We did. We tried again last week, after confirming it was him that was coming with me again, we were again told entry wouldn't be an issue and set off on the 3hr round trip, only for her to say he was d*unk again. Again, I explained I don't touch alcohol anymore and he's not had a drink this year due to his medical conditions. He was banned for life on the basis "she doesn't get a good vibe from him" but I was welcome to leave him outside and come in. An offer I declined on both occasions. I posted a review, obviously negative, after the event. I've subsequently been blocked and (I assume) banned. My friend in question is an outstanding bloke, honest, hilarious, life and soul of the party, not a bad bone in his body. She just took a dislike on, what seems to me, his medical condition... discrimination? Absolutely discrimination - but I wonder if the ban can be uplifted (not that you might want to go after) if he got a letter from his doctor that he could keep as evidence of his medical condition and how it makes him seen to others. I’d imagine in his home area locals know him, (pub landlords etc) and don’t have an issue letting him in. But to people who run a business where it says in the rules that you cannot be intoxicated upon entry, is difficult to know the difference, and some people just point blank refuse to believe it. Reposted as I seem to have lost the ability to do this right the first time " The reason he hasn't drank in months is due to them testing his liver, doctors haven't managed to diagnose him properly yet. I had thought of that but, he doesn't have any "proof" yet. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I'm looking for some feedback please. Last month, me and a good friend of mine, tried going down to a club. We were told by the woman who runs it we were OK to get in, but to come in separately. Now, on the night in question my friend (who has a medical condition that affects his speech and balance, not massively, but noticable) got denied entry as he was talking to a group of lads outside and the woman who runs it (trying not to name names here) said he was d*unk and was part of the group. I explained his condition and that he was with me, not them. That we had discussed it earlier that day. She wouldn't budge. We left is as bad luck and left on good terms with her saying he/we were welcome to come back any other night. We did. We tried again last week, after confirming it was him that was coming with me again, we were again told entry wouldn't be an issue and set off on the 3hr round trip, only for her to say he was d*unk again. Again, I explained I don't touch alcohol anymore and he's not had a drink this year due to his medical conditions. He was banned for life on the basis "she doesn't get a good vibe from him" but I was welcome to leave him outside and come in. An offer I declined on both occasions. I posted a review, obviously negative, after the event. I've subsequently been blocked and (I assume) banned. My friend in question is an outstanding bloke, honest, hilarious, life and soul of the party, not a bad bone in his body. She just took a dislike on, what seems to me, his medical condition... discrimination? " Wow even after explaining everything to them and still no entry! Awful! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"I also just left a review on the same club! " I seen that, I also see they're dismissing it. I've emailed club this morning, see if I get a response. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Sounds really horrible sorry but I'd have to name them call them out definitely sounds discriminating I plano emailing the management to see what they say, before mentioning any names. Sshhh, for now " That email will only reach the person you had the problem with. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Tbf the club is a joke.. not ran by swingers and rules that change to suit whoever is working. It's a shame as decent location and could be so much better. Very sorry to hear of your ordeal " So true!! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The way it was handled was shocking. Communicated everything, throughout both efforts. Messages on here,phone calls directly to the club etc. Its a shame as I was looking forward to trying the club but, management are appalling and I'm not the type to just ditch a friend. I gave the situation the benefit of doubt on the first occasion but, second time round was a complete farce. Its been playing on my mind that maybe my review was harsh but, seems not. I'd love the person in question to post their side, as all I've been told so far is "can't risk it". Though, when I questioned what it was she felt she was risking, all I kept being told was "bad vibe" not one single legitimate reason. I explained neither of us had, or would be drinking. That he was a kind, funny, outgoing guy... that they had nothing to be concerned about. They'd then circle back to "can't chance it" I'm still wondering what they/she felt they were chancing. To make matters worse, a couple also commented on the club review stating he had turned up hammered, which, while untrue, is also ironic as, the couple in question went to his house for a meet... and she turned up absolutely smashed! It all just seems a bit odd to me " I think u forgot to mention your friend was d*unk and that's why he was refused entry | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently I’m banned for publicly slating online, not true…….but it is now so that ticks that previously unticked box. " Very true that box was ticked long ago | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently I’m banned for publicly slating online, not true…….but it is now so that ticks that previously unticked box. Very true that box was ticked long ago" Still waiting to know why Could be a long wait I suppose | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |