FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to Swinging Club Discussion

Fighting Your Corner

Jump to newest
 

By *he Hussy and The Voyeur OP   Couple
over a year ago

Somewhere Only We Know

Following on from another thread.

Local councils and government don't see clubs as an essential part of a lifestyle choice, either business wise, socially, or in any other way.

But if you had to fight your case as to how important they are to help a club re-open, what would be your positive evidence and how would you put your case across to the powers that be to support their and yours lifestyle choice?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *est Wales WifeCouple
over a year ago

Near Carmarthen

We don't go to clubs but the best course of action would be point out that

Secondary legislation introduced by the Government purportedly under The Health Protection (Control of Disease) Act 1984 ("the 1984 Act") is ultra vires;

That those same regulations disproportionately breach various rights of individuals and businesses contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998 ("the HRA") which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights ("the Convention");

That by imposing on itself five tests for varying or terminating the restrictions contained in the regulations it introduced under the 1984 Act, the Government has fettered its discretion and failed to take into account a range of other important factors which ought to mitigate in favour of relaxing or terminating those restrictions; and

the Government's decision or direction to close social clubs, to which people can make their own judgement to attend (or not) in March should be quashed.

Easily sorted once you stand up for your loss of human rights.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he Hussy and The Voyeur OP   Couple
over a year ago

Somewhere Only We Know

Excellent information.

Thank you for your reply.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *tasiaCouple
over a year ago

West Bromwich


"We don't go to clubs but the best course of action would be point out that

Secondary legislation introduced by the Government purportedly under The Health Protection (Control of Disease) Act 1984 ("the 1984 Act") is ultra vires;

That those same regulations disproportionately breach various rights of individuals and businesses contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998 ("the HRA") which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights ("the Convention");

That by imposing on itself five tests for varying or terminating the restrictions contained in the regulations it introduced under the 1984 Act, the Government has fettered its discretion and failed to take into account a range of other important factors which ought to mitigate in favour of relaxing or terminating those restrictions; and

the Government's decision or direction to close social clubs, to which people can make their own judgement to attend (or not) in March should be quashed.

Easily sorted once you stand up for your loss of human rights.

"

Wow....a post on Fab that backs up what they say with law and references.

Thank you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aintscoupleCouple
over a year ago

st helens


"We don't go to clubs but the best course of action would be point out that

Secondary legislation introduced by the Government purportedly under The Health Protection (Control of Disease) Act 1984 ("the 1984 Act") is ultra vires;

That those same regulations disproportionately breach various rights of individuals and businesses contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998 ("the HRA") which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights ("the Convention");

That by imposing on itself five tests for varying or terminating the restrictions contained in the regulations it introduced under the 1984 Act, the Government has fettered its discretion and failed to take into account a range of other important factors which ought to mitigate in favour of relaxing or terminating those restrictions; and

the Government's decision or direction to close social clubs, to which people can make their own judgement to attend (or not) in March should be quashed.

Easily sorted once you stand up for your loss of human rights.

"
Only issue with that is that we will soon no longer be part of the court of european rights.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm not sure how this would work as the human rights act has clauses which is also duty bound to protect human life

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"We don't go to clubs but the best course of action would be point out that

Secondary legislation introduced by the Government purportedly under The Health Protection (Control of Disease) Act 1984 ("the 1984 Act") is ultra vires;

That those same regulations disproportionately breach various rights of individuals and businesses contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998 ("the HRA") which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights ("the Convention");

That by imposing on itself five tests for varying or terminating the restrictions contained in the regulations it introduced under the 1984 Act, the Government has fettered its discretion and failed to take into account a range of other important factors which ought to mitigate in favour of relaxing or terminating those restrictions; and

the Government's decision or direction to close social clubs, to which people can make their own judgement to attend (or not) in March should be quashed.

Easily sorted once you stand up for your loss of human rights.

Only issue with that is that we will soon no longer be part of the court of european rights. "

No we will still be members of human right act, this is separate from Brexit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top