Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to Chat room feedback/discussion |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Something I’ve noticed for a long time now is that it doesn’t matter what your cam is, it will always use a 4:3 ratio image and set it to low quality. This is a bit pants ![]() ![]() Sorry, too techy for me, all I read was "blah blah camera blah cracking arse pic" Once I clocked that I stopped reading lol ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Something I’ve noticed for a long time now is that it doesn’t matter what your cam is, it will always use a 4:3 ratio image and set it to low quality. This is a bit pants ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Something I’ve noticed for a long time now is that it doesn’t matter what your cam is, it will always use a 4:3 ratio image and set it to low quality. This is a bit pants ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() well I for one would certainly love to see those gorgeous bumcheeks in glorious high-def widescreen ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not entirely sure how the site deals with video connections but, if the streams go through the site rather than a direct connection between users it may simply be a cost of bandwidth issue or compatibility with the sites coding having some cams 4:3 and others 16:9 etc and also 4:3 vids take up less screen real estate for those accessing the site on mobile phones. Just a few thoughts." Possibly, however the codec used for high quality webcams is quite optimised, plus free sites have higher quality cams. We pay. I wouldn’t be adverse with it being a pay = higher quality thing however. But it would be really odd to not do a peer to peer connection for this. Not sure on the specifics of how the sites done. But the aspect ratio is an odd choice because 16:9 doesn’t take up an awful lot of screen estate, and I believe the mobile cam already is in 16:9, but forces it to zoom in for older cams? The desktop chat however isn’t. C x | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |