Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to Chat room feedback/discussion |
| Jump to newest |  |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Any chance we could have watersports listed as a category in the galleries? There does seem to be quite a few people listing it in their interests list "Pegging as a category would be nice as well ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Watersports pics/ vids are not allowed" Why ?? There are plenty of photos/vids of "squirting" why not just be honest and call them what they are ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because they are not allowed. Admins previous post below "We're advised it could be classed as extreme pornography and the poster (and possibly us) could be prosecuted. Why take the risk? There are probably loads of places that accept these pics and worse. Fabs isn't one of them, sorry Admin x'"" Yet you allow pics and videos of "squirting" when they are very obviously people peeing?? Strange behaviour  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because they are not allowed. Admins previous post below "We're advised it could be classed as extreme pornography and the poster (and possibly us) could be prosecuted. Why take the risk? There are probably loads of places that accept these pics and worse. Fabs isn't one of them, sorry Admin x'" Yet you allow pics and videos of "squirting" when they are very obviously people peeing?? Strange behaviour ""Squirting" is not technically classed as watersports. Watersports is deliberately peeing not involuntarily expelling urine due to stimulation, so if there is no stimulation going and someone is just peeing it is not allowed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because they are not allowed. Admins previous post below "We're advised it could be classed as extreme pornography and the poster (and possibly us) could be prosecuted. Why take the risk? There are probably loads of places that accept these pics and worse. Fabs isn't one of them, sorry Admin x'" Yet you allow pics and videos of "squirting" when they are very obviously people peeing?? Strange behaviour
"Squirting" is not technically classed as watersports. Watersports is deliberately peeing not involuntarily expelling urine due to stimulation, so if there is no stimulation going and someone is just peeing it is not allowed. "Makes perfect sense of course  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because they are not allowed. Admins previous post below "We're advised it could be classed as extreme pornography and the poster (and possibly us) could be prosecuted. Why take the risk? There are probably loads of places that accept these pics and worse. Fabs isn't one of them, sorry Admin x'" Yet you allow pics and videos of "squirting" when they are very obviously people peeing?? Strange behaviour
"Squirting" is not technically classed as watersports. Watersports is deliberately peeing not involuntarily expelling urine due to stimulation, so if there is no stimulation going and someone is just peeing it is not allowed. "Well theres a good degree of crossover - many women who 'squirt' or 'gush' are peeing. The ones who truly have a full body orgasm and squirt (which is a liquid that does contain urine) are usually being photo'd/video'd in a porn type way, splashing, partner being soaked etc, which is indistinguishable from ws play. Not sure what stimulation has got to do with it. Surely 'stimulating' is more purposeful than not? Times cgange - 20yrs ago no-one talked about squirting, it was seen as pissing when it happened (and mostly it doesn't happen unless you drve for it - its easy for females to resist before it happens too), same with pegging - it's a recent description of something that wasa very taboo but is now mainstream. I'd also include many BDSM activities, lots of fetish stuff too (the puppy play thing, dom/sub, cuckold play, cumkissing, even the bi thing) and i'd include watersports. Just check any porn site - its a catgory, Amazon lists it as a fetish, many saunas and some clubs have WS areas, or WS themed nights. In 2025 it's part of the mainstream, albeit still a niche interest within the mainstream. Nobody has ever been prosecuted for it (even tghe govt doesn't classify it alongside soon-to-be-banned choking pics/vids), there is plenty of WS content already on fab (so not everyone adheres to this ban), and I don't believe its been called out in any of the site T&Cs as banned though its a long time sibce I looked. Its probably down to the mod in question, just hae to get lucky with one of the good ones who can assess things themselves. I mean cumshots are more visual, come from tghe same place and just as 'disgusting' as sterile pee if you go down that train of thought, yet is allowed. We are bombarded with all manner of grotesque photos every day on fab, close ups of genitals (warts abd all) and all sex acts a group of deviants can think of. Yet theoretically a photo of a girl glistening with wetness and massively aroused after someone pee'd some sterile water on her is banned. Crazy. I know Fab looks and feels like a site from 1990, but it doesn't mean it can't reflect 2025 trebds in the lifestyle. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because they are not allowed. Admins previous post below "We're advised it could be classed as extreme pornography and the poster (and possibly us) could be prosecuted. Why take the risk? There are probably loads of places that accept these pics and worse. Fabs isn't one of them, sorry Admin x'" Yet you allow pics and videos of "squirting" when they are very obviously people peeing?? Strange behaviour
"Squirting" is not technically classed as watersports. Watersports is deliberately peeing not involuntarily expelling urine due to stimulation, so if there is no stimulation going and someone is just peeing it is not allowed.
Well theres a good degree of crossover - many women who 'squirt' or 'gush' are peeing. The ones who truly have a full body orgasm and squirt (which is a liquid that does contain urine) are usually being photo'd/video'd in a porn type way, splashing, partner being soaked etc, which is indistinguishable from ws play.
Not sure what stimulation has got to do with it. Surely 'stimulating' is more purposeful than not?
Times cgange - 20yrs ago no-one talked about squirting, it was seen as pissing when it happened (and mostly it doesn't happen unless you drve for it - its easy for females to resist before it happens too), same with pegging - it's a recent description of something that wasa very taboo but is now mainstream. I'd also include many BDSM activities, lots of fetish stuff too (the puppy play thing, dom/sub, cuckold play, cumkissing, even the bi thing) and i'd include watersports. Just check any porn site - its a catgory, Amazon lists it as a fetish, many saunas and some clubs have WS areas, or WS themed nights. In 2025 it's part of the mainstream, albeit still a niche interest within the mainstream. Nobody has ever been prosecuted for it (even tghe govt doesn't classify it alongside soon-to-be-banned choking pics/vids), there is plenty of WS content already on fab (so not everyone adheres to this ban), and I don't believe its been called out in any of the site T&Cs as banned though its a long time sibce I looked.
Its probably down to the mod in question, just hae to get lucky with one of the good ones who can assess things themselves.
I mean cumshots are more visual, come from tghe same place and just as 'disgusting' as sterile pee if you go down that train of thought, yet is allowed.
We are bombarded with all manner of grotesque photos every day on fab, close ups of genitals (warts abd all) and all sex acts a group of deviants can think of. Yet theoretically a photo of a girl glistening with wetness and massively aroused after someone pee'd some sterile water on her is banned. Crazy. I know Fab looks and feels like a site from 1990, but it doesn't mean it can't reflect 2025 trebds in the lifestyle."Deliberately peeing on someone is not allowed to be shown in pictures or videos. If stimulation is seen on a woman then the poster will claim it is squirting which seems to be in a different category and is allowed. But at the end of the day pics and videos of someone deliberately peeing on someone else is not allowed. You may not like it and you may not agree but those are the rules on the site. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Its probably down to the mod in question " It really isn't | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who every was advising fab that it's against the law needs to update their advice as a law was changed back in January 2019. " It doesn't really matter as its still not allowed on here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who every was advising fab that it's against the law needs to update their advice as a law was changed back in January 2019. It doesn't really matter as its still not allowed on here. " The reason given was that it was against the law so the law has changed so that reason doesn't stand so why is it still not allowed? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Admin decided they are still not allowed" Is there a reason ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Admin decided they are still not allowed Is there a reason ? " Yes as they like to take the piss of course. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Because they are not allowed. Admins previous post below "We're advised it could be classed as extreme pornography and the poster (and possibly us) could be prosecuted. Why take the risk? There are probably loads of places that accept these pics and worse. Fabs isn't one of them, sorry Admin x'" Yet you allow pics and videos of "squirting" when they are very obviously people peeing?? Strange behaviour
"Squirting" is not technically classed as watersports. Watersports is deliberately peeing not involuntarily expelling urine due to stimulation, so if there is no stimulation going and someone is just peeing it is not allowed.
Well theres a good degree of crossover - many women who 'squirt' or 'gush' are peeing. The ones who truly have a full body orgasm and squirt (which is a liquid that does contain urine) are usually being photo'd/video'd in a porn type way, splashing, partner being soaked etc, which is indistinguishable from ws play.
Not sure what stimulation has got to do with it. Surely 'stimulating' is more purposeful than not?
Times cgange - 20yrs ago no-one talked about squirting, it was seen as pissing when it happened (and mostly it doesn't happen unless you drve for it - its easy for females to resist before it happens too), same with pegging - it's a recent description of something that wasa very taboo but is now mainstream. I'd also include many BDSM activities, lots of fetish stuff too (the puppy play thing, dom/sub, cuckold play, cumkissing, even the bi thing) and i'd include watersports. Just check any porn site - its a catgory, Amazon lists it as a fetish, many saunas and some clubs have WS areas, or WS themed nights. In 2025 it's part of the mainstream, albeit still a niche interest within the mainstream. Nobody has ever been prosecuted for it (even tghe govt doesn't classify it alongside soon-to-be-banned choking pics/vids), there is plenty of WS content already on fab (so not everyone adheres to this ban), and I don't believe its been called out in any of the site T&Cs as banned though its a long time sibce I looked.
Its probably down to the mod in question, just hae to get lucky with one of the good ones who can assess things themselves.
I mean cumshots are more visual, come from tghe same place and just as 'disgusting' as sterile pee if you go down that train of thought, yet is allowed.
We are bombarded with all manner of grotesque photos every day on fab, close ups of genitals (warts abd all) and all sex acts a group of deviants can think of. Yet theoretically a photo of a girl glistening with wetness and massively aroused after someone pee'd some sterile water on her is banned. Crazy. I know Fab looks and feels like a site from 1990, but it doesn't mean it can't reflect 2025 trebds in the lifestyle."Good post, great comments | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Admin decided they are still not allowed Is there a reason ? " From the advice they had they decided this isn't allowed on the site. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Admin decided they are still not allowed Is there a reason ? From the advice they had they decided this isn't allowed on the site. " The law is full of grey areas and ambiguity, so when it comes to operating a business that could be an easy target for groups who dislike this lifestyle; then you play safe and follow the advice. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
