Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Chat room feedback/discussion |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John" its not as simple as that, what about TS at the start of the journey ? top but not bottom surgery? how people think of themselves may not coincide with how others see them, some TVs are very feminine not all TS are | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John its not as simple as that, what about TS at the start of the journey ? top but not bottom surgery? how people think of themselves may not coincide with how others see them, some TVs are very feminine not all TS are " Hi it's not about how others may see the individual but more so how they see themselves as a gender | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John" This has been asked for many times but always gets ignored. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John" No! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John" I agree 100%, there should be a TS category. Xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John" should also have bi , as a filter on all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John its not as simple as that, what about TS at the start of the journey ? top but not bottom surgery? how people think of themselves may not coincide with how others see them, some TVs are very feminine not all TS are " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Simply Fix with a TS/TG category. Then doesn't matter what stage of the journey we are on. X I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John its not as simple as that, what about TS at the start of the journey ? top but not bottom surgery? how people think of themselves may not coincide with how others see them, some TVs are very feminine not all TS are " Just wanted to say Daniella I think you are one of the most beautiful people I've ever seen xx your profile is inspiring xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TS isn't really a thing though. transsexual implies changing sexuality. The general term currently used for trans people is transgender, TG, but even that is problematic as it is also a blanket term to describe the whole trans spectrum, TV CD and others. Transwoman, transfemale, transfeminine, Transman, transmale, transmasculine. There are a few different options which would suit the descriptor better. But, as has been pointed out, even that isn't clear cut. The OP states a preference for post op transwomen and pre/non op transmen, many men interested in transwomen want pre-op. My personal thought, use one of the descriptors I mention or abbreviate them and potentially add an option for pre-op, however, if a transwoman has had genital surgery I would expect them to drop the trans part and just register as female But, don't hold your breath as this has been mentioned many times in the past and the site owners show no interest in changing things. as a postscript, I would also say that swinger clubs are getting just as bad as many appear to be treating transwomen as transvestites, the discrimination is actually getting worse not better " 100% agree with the last bit, and adding that most just treat trans men as women *from my experience at clubs*. Even the clubs that are extremely vocal about being inclusive online, generally are not as inclusive as they like to think they are. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Agreed! As a trans woman I don’t want to be referred to as TS let alone CD/TV!" But you call yourself transgirl You're very pretty btw. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? Johnshould also have bi , as a filter on all " Bi comes under sexual orientation which is completely different to the current topic. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, think it's a difference. TV is like dressing up as a fetish often as a secret, TS is when you do it openly all the time." You really think that’s the difference between tv and ts? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"TS isn't really a thing though. transsexual implies changing sexuality. The general term currently used for trans people is transgender, TG, but even that is problematic as it is also a blanket term to describe the whole trans spectrum, TV CD and others. Transwoman, transfemale, transfeminine, Transman, transmale, transmasculine. There are a few different options which would suit the descriptor better. But, as has been pointed out, even that isn't clear cut. The OP states a preference for post op transwomen and pre/non op transmen, many men interested in transwomen want pre-op. My personal thought, use one of the descriptors I mention or abbreviate them and potentially add an option for pre-op, however, if a transwoman has had genital surgery I would expect them to drop the trans part and just register as female But, don't hold your breath as this has been mentioned many times in the past and the site owners show no interest in changing things. as a postscript, I would also say that swinger clubs are getting just as bad as many appear to be treating transwomen as transvestites, the discrimination is actually getting worse not better " A massive shout out to After Dark in Edinburgh. Thank you for treating me so well on my last couple of visits. Trans women, you will be welcome here xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yeah, think it's a difference. TV is like dressing up as a fetish often as a secret, TS is when you do it openly all the time. You really think that’s the difference between tv and ts?" Honestly? Yeah. TS is a personality, TV is a kink | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I agree. there is a difference between a TS and a TV/cd.im not really attracted by TVs or CDs as most are just hairy guys wearing women's underwear,but a TS is a guy who wants to be a woman and looks like a woman and they are sexy as hell.been lucky enough to fuck one or two and they are such a turn on and yes should be classed separately." The identification process should only be done for the requirements of the trans person, not those who may be attracted to them etc. There have been extensive discussions about this, for almost 20 years in Fab. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I agree. there is a difference between a TS and a TV/cd.im not really attracted by TVs or CDs as most are just hairy guys wearing women's underwear,but a TS is a guy who wants to be a woman and looks like a woman and they are sexy as hell.been lucky enough to fuck one or two and they are such a turn on and yes should be classed separately." you are totally wrong and a bit naive assuming every tv is a hairy guy wearing feminine clothing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I agree. there is a difference between a TS and a TV/cd.im not really attracted by TVs or CDs as most are just hairy guys wearing women's underwear,but a TS is a guy who wants to be a woman and looks like a woman and they are sexy as hell.been lucky enough to fuck one or two and they are such a turn on and yes should be classed separately.you are totally wrong and a bit naive assuming every tv is a hairy guy wearing feminine clothing. " You're right, some are just accidentally metrosexual men who neither eat nor work out | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should have TG not TS and then crossdresser/TV. They should also just have trans woman and trans man as well as NB, GQ, and agender." Ridiculous ... so many abbreviations. What does NB and GQ even mean? You're either male, female, transitioning from one to the other (trans), or a TV. The rest can go into the profile description. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I agree. there is a difference between a TS and a TV/cd.im not really attracted by TVs or CDs as most are just hairy guys wearing women's underwear,but a TS is a guy who wants to be a woman and looks like a woman and they are sexy as hell.been lucky enough to fuck one or two and they are such a turn on and yes should be classed separately.you are totally wrong and a bit naive assuming every tv is a hairy guy wearing feminine clothing. " I said most TVs CDs,not all.this is from my experience of this site and seeing some at clubs.a TS is so much more sexy and feminine than a hairy stocky guy in his wifes panties!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should have TG not TS and then crossdresser/TV. They should also just have trans woman and trans man as well as NB, GQ, and agender." Totally on board for this | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should have TG not TS and then crossdresser/TV. They should also just have trans woman and trans man as well as NB, GQ, and agender. Totally on board for this" Totally agree. Never going to happen!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Site changes to CD/TV and adds Transgender or TS. New thread will be started not long after. ‘Why do so many TV or Men put themselves in the wrong category ?’ ‘The TS category should have post and pre op’ ‘Why is there a TS category when those Trans Women could just label themselves as women ?’ ‘Noticed that the most attractive Trans Women aren’t using the TS category’ Or some such thread. Let’s be honest on a sex site, what people who want the category changing really want…. ‘Can we have a category for women with a penis who are attractive or feminine looking’ I doubt the majority of the people who want to meet a Trans Woman really want her without the fun bits. " Funny how people think that one op is the only difference. They need education ! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This topic is always 50% Karens trying to look "woke" & 50% males who just want the wank material better categorised, let's be honest." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What about people who do not want to be categorised by others and are quite happy defining themselves? Just a thought." Then it'd make it easier for them to define themselves more accurately? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should have TG not TS and then crossdresser/TV. They should also just have trans woman and trans man as well as NB, GQ, and agender. Totally on board for this" As an enby, me too, me too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They should have TG not TS and then crossdresser/TV. They should also just have trans woman and trans man as well as NB, GQ, and agender. Ridiculous ... so many abbreviations. What does NB and GQ even mean? You're either male, female, transitioning from one to the other (trans), or a TV. The rest can go into the profile description." I'm answering this in good faith. Non binary or gender queer. Those of us who feel neither male nor female, we aren't transitioning from one to the other, we if anything transition from one to none, or in my specific case an acceptance of both my male and female sides. (From a purely scientific point of view, while I've not had my chromosomes tested there is scientific evidence that points to me being intersex and no that's as much medical data as I'm giving out) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What diff does it make we look at photos hopefully read profiles and either like or dislike no biggee labels mean nothing" This makes no sense... Get rid of gendered profiles then? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What diff does it make we look at photos hopefully read profiles and either like or dislike no biggee labels mean nothing This makes no sense... Get rid of gendered profiles then?" It's the 'hopefully read profiles' like that had me in stitches, cause that is something that happens right? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site should be more able to allow trans girls to show up how they want to I totally agree. There is a world of difference between a TV and a Ts but limiting it is unfair. If they identify as a woman they are " You're also assuming that every trans person is a woman, stop it. Trans men exist on here too. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This site should be more able to allow trans girls to show up how they want to I totally agree. There is a world of difference between a TV and a Ts but limiting it is unfair. If they identify as a woman they are You're also assuming that every trans person is a woman, stop it. Trans men exist on here too. " But I'm adding that the site labels Trans Men on TV/TS accounts as She/Her whenever we get our first verification for some reason as well, so the option to change that would be nice as well as not being all grouped as TV/TS in the first place like you mentioned in your comment | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sensible and simple start without getting too complex. As TS/TG myself I get fed up of guys asking 'are you dressed' and ' I want you dressed and in wig', etc, etc. As TS/TG I always present as fem rather than occasional transvestism and cross-dressing." I get the same, it's frustrating | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"CD/TV and TS/TG I would have thought this was the way to go." Sensible and simple start without getting too complex. As TS/TG myself I get fed up of guys asking 'are you dressed' and ' I want you dressed and in wig', etc, etc. As TS/TG I always present as fem rather than occasional transvestism and cross-dressing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"CD/TV and TS/TG I would have thought this was the way to go. Sensible and simple start without getting too complex. As TS/TG myself I get fed up of guys asking 'are you dressed' and ' I want you dressed and in wig', etc, etc. As TS/TG I always present as fem rather than occasional transvestism and cross-dressing." spot on. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Perhaps the options should be male, female, read the profile?" It already is, it's the read the profile but that people don't bother doing and why we get annoyed about being lumped in to one category in the first place | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is probably going to cause a lot of upset but a TS is someone who looks like a woman and is as sexy as any woman they will have boobs but a cock too.a TV is a man who fully dresses as a woman but has no boobs and will wear a wig usually.they can also be very attractive but some are hairy men or big guys in women's clothes and CDs are just guys wearing panties.i think there should be different categories as a lot of guys find TS really sexy but are not interested in TVs or CDs." wrong, wrong, wrong. Some of us, are actually quite pretty. Some of us take great effort to look the part. I know an awful lot of pretty tvs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Let's have I woke up this morning and identified as a baboon page as well or was it a kangaroo, you can't scream for respect then isolate, we're all adults and 99% are not judgemental " 99% are judgemental. Also 99% will not admit it. We all judge others without even know it. You'd be surprised. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is probably going to cause a lot of upset but a TS is someone who looks like a woman and is as sexy as any woman they will have boobs but a cock too.a TV is a man who fully dresses as a woman but has no boobs and will wear a wig usually.they can also be very attractive but some are hairy men or big guys in women's clothes and CDs are just guys wearing panties.i think there should be different categories as a lot of guys find TS really sexy but are not interested in TVs or CDs." Of all the descriptions ever made of TS/TV/CD this surely has to be up there as the most inaccurate of all time! Particularly like the TS have boobs and a cock and CD’s are just guys wearing panties lines! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is probably going to cause a lot of upset but a TS is someone who looks like a woman and is as sexy as any woman they will have boobs but a cock too.a TV is a man who fully dresses as a woman but has no boobs and will wear a wig usually.they can also be very attractive but some are hairy men or big guys in women's clothes and CDs are just guys wearing panties.i think there should be different categories as a lot of guys find TS really sexy but are not interested in TVs or CDs." If you don’t identify in any of these categories you aren’t qualified to define them. Would you tell black peoole what it is to be black? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is probably going to cause a lot of upset but a TS is someone who looks like a woman and is as sexy as any woman they will have boobs but a cock too" What, even trans men? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think it's wrong to have CD/TV lumped in with TS - surely this isn't right ? I'm interested in FTM and post op MTF *not* cd/tv guys... there is a big difference... why do the owners persist in this ?? John This has been asked for many times but always gets ignored. " Decent sized cams would be nice too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"On tvchix I have met people who referred to themselves as pre-op transexuals and Were ugly as fuck. I have met people who referred to themselves as guys who likes to crossdress, and were really beautiful and effeminate. Tags are just confusing. Tvchix goes to the other extreme and has about ten labels (there will be more in a few years time), honestly I just read the wording and look at the photos to get a true idea what to expect. And the same here....read the profile and check out the photos " you are spot on xx, It's not rocket science. People make life so difficult | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Yes I agree. there is a difference between a TS and a TV/cd.im not really attracted by TVs or CDs as most are just hairy guys wearing women's underwear,but a TS is a guy who wants to be a woman and looks like a woman and they are sexy as hell.been lucky enough to fuck one or two and they are such a turn on and yes should be classed separately. The identification process should only be done for the requirements of the trans person, not those who may be attracted to them etc. There have been extensive discussions about this, for almost 20 years in Fab. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |