Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to Chat room feedback/discussion |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What if the couple don't live together? " surely if that was the case 90% of the time you would see your significant other within 30 days let alone after 3 months ? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You can't create an account anymore without photo verification, it just won't let you into the site til the pic has been approved" This is not true. PV is not compulsory to all | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You can't create an account anymore without photo verification, it just won't let you into the site til the pic has been approved This is not true. PV is not compulsory to all" I new this but personally for couple to prevent the fakes and frauds you should make it compulsory would stop it of hassle and personally will do better for the site just my option | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You can't create an account anymore without photo verification, it just won't let you into the site til the pic has been approved This is not true. PV is not compulsory to all I new this but personally for couple to prevent the fakes and frauds you should make it compulsory would stop it of hassle and personally will do better for the site just my option " We totally agree with this, the site is slowly dying with the amount of fakes driving people away | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What if the couple don't live together? surely if that was the case 90% of the time you would see your significant other within 30 days let alone after 3 months ? " I haven't seen my DD for 5 months now | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seems to us there is a lot of un verified couples on here surly after the first 7 days you would be picture verified by Fabs admins but after 3/6/12 months and nothing Does any one think there should be a 30 day time limit as a couple weather it’s MM MF FF To get there verification in if not account get shut down , surely this would also stop fakes and a lot of tome wasters ? Thought , " No It's up to the couple or individual whether they feel the need to get verified or not Of course you are not obliged to make contact or respond to anyone that isn't verified We all have choices. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seems to us there is a lot of un verified couples on here surly after the first 7 days you would be picture verified by Fabs admins but after 3/6/12 months and nothing Does any one think there should be a 30 day time limit as a couple weather it’s MM MF FF To get there verification in if not account get shut down , surely this would also stop fakes and a lot of tome wasters ? Thought , " Great idea but the site doesn't care as long as people are willing to pay for site sponsorship. We had to PV before we could upload pics as we have been here before. We don't mind having to photo verify but feel that it should be compulsory for all not just some. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What if the couple don't live together? surely if that was the case 90% of the time you would see your significant other within 30 days let alone after 3 months ? " We didn’t think of it before lockdown, have only just seen each other in the last couple of weeks and oddly taking a verification photo wasn’t top of the list of things to do! And we don’t live together and don’t always get to see each other within 30 days as depends on shifts and child care arrangements. Totally get where you are coming from, but it isn’t always quite that easy. X | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What if the couple don't live together? surely if that was the case 90% of the time you would see your significant other within 30 days let alone after 3 months ? I haven't seen my DD for 5 months now " We've not seen each other since February. When the site gives you all the tools you need to avoid xyz, why don't people use them, instead of wanting the site to impose their own rules? E | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Admin have said they are not going to make PV compulsory for all but they have made the filters block out anyone who isn't verified so the site will work how you want it to. If you think someone is fake you could report and let Admin check it out https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters " Could the filter be split in two separate ones? One for pv and the other for meet/cam verifications? Thanks. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Admin have said they are not going to make PV compulsory for all but they have made the filters block out anyone who isn't verified so the site will work how you want it to. If you think someone is fake you could report and let Admin check it out https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters Could the filter be split in two separate ones? One for pv and the other for meet/cam verifications? Thanks." Isn't it already, A green flag or a green tick? S | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Admin have said they are not going to make PV compulsory for all but they have made the filters block out anyone who isn't verified so the site will work how you want it to. If you think someone is fake you could report and let Admin check it out https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters Could the filter be split in two separate ones? One for pv and the other for meet/cam verifications? Thanks. Isn't it already, A green flag or a green tick? S" It's only one filter at the moment. Enough to have pv or meet/cam tick and you can message. So if I don't want messages from profiles that have no pv I still get messages if they are meet/cam verified without pv. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Admin have said they are not going to make PV compulsory for all but they have made the filters block out anyone who isn't verified so the site will work how you want it to. If you think someone is fake you could report and let Admin check it out https://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters Could the filter be split in two separate ones? One for pv and the other for meet/cam verifications? Thanks. Isn't it already, A green flag or a green tick? S It's only one filter at the moment. Enough to have pv or meet/cam tick and you can message. So if I don't want messages from profiles that have no pv I still get messages if they are meet/cam verified without pv." Gotcha | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We took a while to verify as don't want our faces or pics forced to be uploaded to verify things, there are other ways than giving a website facepics holding pieces of paper god knows what will ever happen to them in the future!!" You don't have to show faces for pv. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We took a while to verify as don't want our faces or pics forced to be uploaded to verify things, there are other ways than giving a website facepics holding pieces of paper god knows what will ever happen to them in the future!! You don't have to show faces for pv." That’s not what thenonformation explains when u click photo verified face of both and or full body photos with the paper and hands showing | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Get Photo Verified A great way to show you're genuine. 1: Write "FabSwingers.com" and your username "TheRainMan" on a piece of paper. 2: Photograph yourself holding the paper with hands showing. Photo should show your face _OR_ full length nude." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We took a while to verify as don't want our faces or pics forced to be uploaded to verify things, there are other ways than giving a website facepics holding pieces of paper god knows what will ever happen to them in the future!! You don't have to show faces for pv. That’s not what thenonformation explains when u click photo verified face of both and or full body photos with the paper and hands showing " Yep, as you say: OR full body photos. You can crop the heads out or obscure faces if you're using full body option. That's how I've PVed on this profile and with hubby on the couple's one. No faces were displayed. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We took a while to verify as don't want our faces or pics forced to be uploaded to verify things, there are other ways than giving a website facepics holding pieces of paper god knows what will ever happen to them in the future!! You don't have to show faces for pv. That’s not what thenonformation explains when u click photo verified face of both and or full body photos with the paper and hands showing Yep, as you say: OR full body photos. You can crop the heads out or obscure faces if you're using full body option. That's how I've PVed on this profile and with hubby on the couple's one. No faces were displayed." Maybe fab mods need to look at there wording the As for us a full body picture is head included | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You can't create an account anymore without photo verification, it just won't let you into the site til the pic has been approved This is not true. PV is not compulsory to all" My bad, just been the every profile we've ever had has required it. Is it a fab secret why it's not mandatory or how profiles are selected? Although not perfect surely some sort of pv is better than none? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You can't create an account anymore without photo verification, it just won't let you into the site til the pic has been approved This is not true. PV is not compulsory to all My bad, just been the every profile we've ever had has required it. Is it a fab secret why it's not mandatory or how profiles are selected? Although not perfect surely some sort of pv is better than none? " Maybe you make profile often and they pic up on that? Iv recently made a couples profile and wasn't asked to pv. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"*pick up" 4 in 5 years, one abandoned through lack of use, one closed cos of another users behaviour, one current couple, one current solo Wouldn't have thought excessive | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a very private couple that won't give out face pics at the drop of a hat. Aren't interested in webcams and only (although looking to play in UK ) play in clubs abroad. Have had alot of the more serious swingers think we are fake (one just today). The few verified couples / males we have engaged with and planned to meet before lockdown have pulled out last minute...and not willing to meet the obvious cheating husbands that constantly message. And not willing to meet with people just to get verified...The reality of meeting folks on here verified or not that have similar / the same outlook on swinging and or safe sex that are willing to meet is rare." From our point of view, we too want to actually meet, have little/no interest in webcam antics or meeting the cheating masses, so imagine going through all you usually have to go through arranging a meet but then actually having someone turn up. By then it's taken us to either get child care sorted for an evening, at our expense, or arrange a mid week day off, at our expense, only to find that there's no physical attraction. This could have been negated before that stage by sharing a face pic. We also frequently find that finding a couple where there is equal levels of attraction for our opposites and vice versa that would allow full swap to happen is very difficult as neither of us is prepared to 'take one for the team'. This too can be found early be sharing a face pic. I understand privacy concerns but I don't see the problem with giving face pics as long as they are not an x-rated image in and of themselves. Digital photo manipulation is so easy these days any of photo taken from the internet could be made look like it's from here and in a lot of cases any old photo from the internet actual ends up in here in any case. Verification is not the only tool we use but it makes up part of a bigger picture for us. Actually knowing that admin or another user can confirm that, at least one stage, there was actually a couple behind a couples profile we find reassuring. Jay | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"*pick up 4 in 5 years, one abandoned through lack of use, one closed cos of another users behaviour, one current couple, one current solo Wouldn't have thought excessive" It has nothing to do with how many times people have joined | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |